· Parchment Paper & Baking Liners
Heavy Duty Unbleached Parchment Paper Rounds
Lower concern, but opaque on coating chemistry; ask the brand or choose certified alternatives.
The brand's unbleached parchment rounds are marketed as heavy-duty, suggesting water- and grease-resistant coating. The brand discloses nothing about PFAS or specific coating chemistry.
The better-graded swap
If You Care
If You Care Parchment Baking Sheets
90/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
unbleached paper with food-contact coating (silicone or oil-based)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Heavy Duty Unbleached Paper Rounds is made of, ingredients and materials
The brand's unbleached parchment rounds consist of cellulose paper (bleach-free, reducing chemical processing) coated with a food-contact layer that is either silicone-based or mineral oil-based to prevent sticking. Unbleached paper avoids chlorine residues from bleaching, but the coating composition is the critical unknown, silicone coatings are generally heat-stable and inert, while oil-based coatings may migrate into fatty foods at high temperatures. The brand has not publicly disclosed which type is used or whether the coating contains PFAS, Teflon-family coating, or other non-stick additives.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Coating leaching under heat stress
If the coating is not disclosed as silicone, oil-based sealants may migrate into fatty or acidic foods when heated above 350-400 degrees Fahrenheit. Reuse amplifies this risk as the coating degrades.
Paper degradation and microfiber release
Repeated use or high heat causes the cellulose substrate to weaken; fragments may shed into food. Unbleached paper does not eliminate this risk, only reduces chemical bleach residues.
Coating composition unknown (non-stick additive uncertainty)
No public disclosure on whether the coating uses Teflon-type coating, silicone, wax, or other agents; unverified claims of 'natural' coatings are common in this category but not substantiated for this brand.
No third-party safety certification
Parchment is not NSF, FDA pre-approved, or independently tested for food contact; regulatory compliance is assumed but not verified.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
The brand is a mid-market housewares brand sold primarily through Amazon with no public safety certifications (e.g., NSF, FDA pre-approval statements) or PFAS-specific commitments in available materials. The company does not disclose coating chemistry, third-party testing results, or responses to PFAS concerns on its website or packaging. No major product recalls for this line have been reported, but the brand's silence on coating identity is a transparency gap relative to competitors who voluntarily specify silicone or Teflon-type coating-free formulations.
How it compares in its category
Unbleached parchment is a lower-chemical choice than bleached paper, positioning it well against conventional brands, but it underperforms versus explicitly PFAS-free certified options (e.g., If You Care, Regency) or silicone-lined products with third-party verification. Most mass-market parchment paper, including the brand, does not disclose coating type; the unbleached claim is a partial advantage but does not address the non-stick layer. For consumers prioritizing transparency, certified alternatives cost slightly more but remove guesswork.
If you buy it
Use only below 420 degrees Fahrenheit (silicone's typical safe upper limit); do not reuse sheets more than 3-5 times, as the coating degrades and paper fibers expose. Inspect each sheet for tears, dark stains, or odor before use; discard if coating appears damaged. Store in a cool, dry place away from oils and strong odors, which can degrade the non-stick layer. If you want certainty on PFAS and coating chemistry, contact directly or switch to a brand with published safety data.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Heavy Duty Unbleached Parchment Paper Rounds?
- silicone-coated parchment paper
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Paper degradation and particulate shedding
- unbleached paper with silicone coating
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Silicone coating degradation at high heat
- bleached paper with silicone coating
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Paper degradation and fragmentation
More parchment paper & baking liners grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.