PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
GORE-TEX Breathable Rainwear CEB Jacket

Gore · Rain Jackets

GORE-TEX Breathable Rainwear CEB Jacket

Bad

GORE-TEX historically used PFAS; no current disclosure from Keen available

Verdict: SkipGORE-TEX membrane carries established PFAS legacy; no current Keen disclosure available. Non-PFAS hazards minimal if jacket is unworn indoors and laundered before first wear.

GORE-TEX breathable membranes traditionally relied on PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. Keen makes no public PFAS disclosure for this model. Contact brand directly for current coating chemistry.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

GORE-TEX membrane with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

The specific dye chemistry for the CEB Jacket's color is not disclosed. GORE-TEX outer fabrics often use commercial acid or disperse dyes; some formulations may contain restricted azo compounds or trace metals. Keen does not publish dye test reports. Pre-wash reduces loose dye transfer.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester layers

GORE-TEX laminates typically use polyester; antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester production. Residual antimony content in finished textiles is typically below regulatory limits but not always tested. No Keen-specific antimony data is available. Risk is minor if jacket is not ingested or worn against broken skin.

70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

New GORE-TEX products commonly show mild chemical odor due to adhesives and residual solvents in the membrane lamination. Multiple consumer reports note this in the first weeks of ownership. Off-gassing diminishes significantly after 3-5 washes and 1-2 weeks of air exposure; it is not linked to serious health effects in normal outdoor use.

45/ 100
🫧

Membrane degradation and microfiber shedding

Teflon-type coating membranes can degrade under prolonged UV exposure or mechanical stress, potentially shedding microscopic polymer particles. Keen does not disclose the membrane's UV durability rating or expected lifespan. Storing the jacket indoors and avoiding abrasive surfaces reduces shed risk. Replacement is typically recommended after 5-10 years of regular use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public testing data for Keen GORE-TEX jackets identify formaldehyde in finish treatments. GORE-TEX itself does not typically use formaldehyde, but the outer fabric or thread may. Pre-wash laundering and off-gassing before wear mitigate any residual exposure.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

GORE-TEX is a microporous polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon-type coating) membrane bonded to fabric layers, designed to repel water while allowing vapor transmission. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish on the outer fabric is a separate chemical coating, historically PFAS-based in most commercial rainwear. GORE-TEX's own membrane has historically contained PFAS perfluorochemicals as processing aids, though the company has stated they remove most during manufacturing. No public breakdown of residual PFAS content in finished Keen jackets exists.

The brand's record and disclosure

Keen (a subsidiary of Wolverine World Wide) has not published a PFAS reduction roadmap or third-party test data for this specific product line. Wolverine announced a 2025 goal to eliminate PFAS from water-repellent coating finishes across brands, but no current certification or product-level disclosure is visible for the CEB Jacket. The company does not market this item as PFAS-free or PFAS-reduced. Keen's general apparel certifications focus on labor and materials sourcing, not chemical content transparency.

How it compares in its category

Most breathable waterproof rainwear (Arc'teryx, Patagonia, The North Face) similarly rely on Teflon-type coating membranes or polyurethane lamination, and the majority still use PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes as standard. Patagonia and a few smaller brands have piloted PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternatives, but they remain premium-priced and less widely available. GORE-TEX jackets occupy the mainstream mid-to-premium tier where PFAS-legacy materials dominate. Non-membrane alternatives (waxed cotton, polyurethane coatings) eliminate PFAS but sacrifice breathability and durability.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket on gentle cycle with cool water before wearing to reduce loose surface chemicals and finishes. Avoid machine drying and direct heat (dryers, irons), which can degrade the membrane and release volatile compounds. Reapply water-repellent coating after 50-100 washes with a PFAS-free brand if available (e.g., Grangers Performance Repel or similar). Store indoors in a cool, dry space; do not air-dry near heat vents or in direct sunlight for extended periods.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Gore has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.