PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
KEEN KUTTER Anorak Jacket (Jet), Keen Kutter USA

Keen · Rain Jackets

KEEN KUTTER Anorak Jacket (Jet), Keen Kutter USA

Bad

water-repellent coating-treated outerwear with no PFAS disclosure; avoid if concerned.

Verdict · SkipNylon anorak with water-repellent coating poses unknown PFAS risk; no brand transparency on chemistry. Acceptable if PFAS concern is secondary; monitor for coating degradation.

Keen Kutter does not disclose PFAS in this anorak's water-repellent treatment. Most legacy water-repellent coating coatings contain PFAS or fluorinated compounds; verify with brand before purchase.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What KEEN KUTTER Anorak Jacket Keen Kutter USA is made of, ingredients and materials

This jacket is nylon with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. water-repellent coating finishes are typically applied to outerwear to shed water without trapping moisture, but the specific chemistry of Keen Kutter's formulation is not disclosed. The nylon base itself is stable, but the coating's composition determines whether it contains PFAS compounds (a known durability trade-off in the industry) or alternatives with lower concern. Without ingredient transparency, the actual risk profile cannot be confirmed.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon anoraks commonly use traditional PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes for durability. Keen Kutter has not disclosed whether this jacket uses PFAS-free alternatives; no testing or certification is publicly available.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Water-repellent coating coatings degrade with washing and wear, especially without proper care. Shed particles may enter waterways; regular reapplication of alternatives with lower concern can mitigate this risk.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes in nylon fabric

No recalls or warnings specific to Keen Kutter nylon apparel for azo dye contamination. This is a standard concern across colored nylon but not flagged for this brand in particular.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based textile resins are less common in water-repellent coating coatings than in cotton finishes. No public evidence of this hazard in Keen Kutter nylon products.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented recalls for Keen Kutter jackets involving cadmium or lead in dyes. Standard industry practice is to avoid heavy metal dyes, but verification is not available.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Keen Kutter USA has not publicly disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry or adopted PFAS-free commitments as a brand policy. No major recalls or chemical safety controversies are on record for Keen Kutter outerwear. The brand's silence on water-repellent coating composition is consistent with many mid-market outdoor apparel makers, but contrasts with competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) that explicitly market PFAS-free treatments. This lack of transparency is the primary concern.

How it compares in its category

Most affordable nylon anoraks under $150 rely on conventional water-repellent coating finishes, many of which contain PFAS. Brands like Columbia and L.L.Bean occupy similar price/disclosure tiers. High-end alternatives (Patagonia, Arcteryx) explicitly use options not linked to PFAS but cost 2-3x more. If PFAS exposure is a priority, this product offers no reassurance; if water shedding and durability matter more, it is typical for the price point.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water with mild detergent to minimize coating breakdown and microplastic shedding. Avoid heat (tumble dry on low or air dry only) to preserve the water-repellent coating layer. Reapply a PFAS-free water-repellent coating refresher (e.g., Nikwax TX) annually to extend durability and reduce the need for replacement. Do not dry clean, as solvents can strip or degrade the coating.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Keen has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.