PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
L*Space Sunrise Shell Bikini Top

Lspace · Swimwear

L*Space Sunrise Shell Bikini Top

Bad

Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating chemistry, PFAS risk likely but unconfirmed.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester blend with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment poses likely PFAS exposure; non-PFAS hazards are standard for category. Buy only if brand eventually discloses chemistry or you accept PFAS uncertainty.

L*Space swimwear uses water-repellent coating treatments typical in swim apparel, which commonly contain PFAS to repel water and salt. The brand makes no public disclosure of PFAS presence or absence.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What L*Space Sunrise Shell Bikini Top is made of, ingredients and materials

This bikini top is a nylon/polyester blend, both synthetic fibers that are chemically inert against skin under normal wear conditions. The material's real concern is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS-based chemistry (perfluorinated compounds), though some newer formulations use non-PFAS alternatives; L*Space has not publicly disclosed which type they use, making risk assessment incomplete.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The undisclosed water-repellent coating finish is the primary hazard. Historical water-repellent coating formulations used C8 or C6 PFAS compounds; modern alternatives exist but L*Space has not stated which they employ. Residual water-repellent coating chemicals on fabric may transfer to skin, especially when wet or warm.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester component

Polyester fabrics are often dyed with azo dyes, some of which can release carcinogenic aromatic amines under sweat or chlorine exposure. No specific testing or recalls for L*Space products are on record, but the risk is inherent to untested polyester swim products.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon and polyester manufacturing may involve formaldehyde-containing resins in finishing stages. Residual formaldehyde on unwashed fabric can irritate sensitive skin; initial rinsing mitigates this risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during washing

All synthetic swimwear sheds microfibers when washed. While this is not a skin hazard, it is an environmental concern. Using a microfiber-catching wash bag reduces shedding into aquatic systems.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Elastane (spandex) degradation over time

Swimwear blends typically contain 15-20% spandex for stretch. No toxicity hazard is established, but UV and chlorine exposure degrade elastane faster than nylon, reducing garment lifespan and increasing replacement frequency.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

L*Space does not maintain public certifications (such as OEKO-TEX, Cradle to Cradle, or GOTS) and has not issued statements on water-repellent coating chemistry, PFAS use, or chemical transparency. The brand is a swimwear-focused label without documented chemical disclosure initiatives or third-party safety audits on record. This silence is the primary red flag; absence of transparency on processing chemicals is typical in mid-tier swim brands but does not rule out PFAS use.

How it compares in its category

Most commercial swimwear relies on water-repellent coating treatments, so this product is not exceptional in chemical exposure risk. Premium swim brands (e.g., Patagonia) increasingly disclose non-PFAS water-repellent coating options or omit water repellency. Budget and mid-tier brands like L*Space rarely volunteer this information, placing them in a middle ground, higher risk than transparent brands, but standard practice within their segment.

If you buy it

Rinse the top in cool water before first wear to remove excess finish. Wash in cold water with mild detergent after each use and air-dry to extend the water-repellent coating's life. Avoid hot water, chlorine, and fabric softeners, which degrade both the nylon and the water-repellent layer. Replace the garment when the water-repellent coating visibly fails (water no longer beads on fabric) or after 2 to 3 seasons of regular use, whichever comes first.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lspace has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Solid & Striped Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

Solid & Striped

Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton/cotton-blend seersucker plaid
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and colorfast stability

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

adidas Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

Adidas

Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polyester/nylon swimsuit fabric, likely uncoated or standard finish
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.