PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall18/ 100Bad
Maybelline SuperStay 24 2-Step Liquid Lipstick

Maybelline SuperStay · Lipstick

Maybelline SuperStay 24 2-Step Liquid Lipstick

Poor

Waterproof cosmetics carry moderate PFAS risk without public testing or brand disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipModerate PFAS risk in waterproof formula; no major established non-PFAS hazards reported, but brand lacks transparency on ingredients and testing.

This waterproof two-step liquid lipstick often involves PFAS-based coatings or film-formers to achieve water resistance in cosmetics. Maybelline has made no public PFAS claims or third-party certifications, with no independent lab data publicly available for this specific product.

The safe swap

MAC Frost Lipstick

MAC Fix+

MAC Frost Lipstick

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid pigments, film-forming polymers, waterproof topcoat

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproofing sealants in long-wear liquid lipsticks frequently contain fluorinated polymers or Teflon-type coating-based compounds. Maybelline has not disclosed ingredient sourcing or tested this product for PFAS content; risk is estimated moderate based on product category and brand opacity.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Contact dermatitis or lip sensitization from film-forming polymers

Acrylate-based film-formers and silicones in long-wear formulas can trigger irritation, drying, or allergic contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals, especially with prolonged daily use. No specific adverse event data exists for this SKU, but the formula type and extended wear are known irritants for a subset of users.

70/ 100
⚠️

Oral ingestion risk and polymer safety if ingested

Liquid lipsticks are not intended for ingestion but residues are inevitably swallowed during eating and drinking. The acrylate polymers and waterproof resins are approved for skin contact but are not food-grade; chronic low-level ingestion poses unknown long-term risk due to lack of toxicology data in cosmetic literature.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test results on record show lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in SuperStay 24. Azo dyes and synthetic iron oxides are FDA-approved colorants; however, Maybelline does not publish independent heavy metal testing, so contamination risk cannot be fully ruled out.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Fragrance allergens

SuperStay 24 formulations typically contain fragrance and/or flavor compounds. Maybelline does not disclose fragrance constituents (parfum is listed as single ingredient). Known fragrance allergens like limonene or geraniol may be present but are not disclosed on the label.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

SuperStay 24 is a two-part liquid lipstick system: a pigmented base layer (azo dyes, iron oxides, film-forming polymers like acrylates) and a waterproof topcoat sealant. The waterproofing mechanism typically relies on silicone-based or Teflon-family coating resins to create a long-wearing barrier. Waterproof cosmetics are where PFAS compounds most commonly appear in lipsticks because they provide water and oil repellency; Maybelline has not disclosed whether fluorine-based ingredients are used in the topcoat.

The brand's record and disclosure

Maybelline (owned by L'Oreal) does not publish ingredient safety certifications, PFAS sourcing statements, or third-party heavy metal testing results for this line. The brand has faced no major recalls or regulatory actions specific to SuperStay 24. However, the lack of voluntary transparency on fluorine chemistry and pigment sourcing is notable in a category where competitors increasingly disclose formulation data in response to PFAS concerns in cosmetics.

How it compares in its category

Long-wear liquid lipsticks as a category carry higher PFAS likelihood than traditional creams because waterproofing is a defining feature. SuperStay 24 is mainstream mass-market; alternatives like Revlon ColorStay or NYX Lip Lingerie also lack public PFAS testing. Premium and indie brands (MAC, Fenty, Glossier) increasingly provide ingredient transparency, though many still do not test for PFAS. None of these products have PFAS recalls on record, but absence of disclosure does not mean absence of risk.

If you buy it

Apply only to lips; do not ingest or use on broken skin. Remove with makeup remover or oil cleanser after 8-12 hours of wear to prevent pigment staining and resin buildup. If lips develop irritation, drying, or contact dermatitis, discontinue and patch-test the base and topcoat separately to identify the culprit. Store away from heat and direct sunlight; the polymer matrix can degrade under UV and temperature extremes, potentially altering formulation stability.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Maybelline SuperStay has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Lipstick

MAC Frost Lipstick

MAC Fix+

MAC Frost Lipstick

wax, oils, pigments, emollients (typical lipstick base)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants (allergic sensitization)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance and flavor oils (allergen, aspiration risk)

Limited concern

70

Lower risk from standard lipstick formula, though MAC makes no PFAS statement.

Risky category by default

MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set

MAC Fix+

MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set

liquid/cream lipstick with standard pigments and emollients

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
🍳

Coating or formula instability causing separation or contamination

Limited concern

70

Lower risk for typical cosmetic formula without known PFAS drivers, though brand remains silent on PFAS.

Risky category by default

NARS Powermatte Lipstick

NARS

Powermatte Lipstick

Pigments, waxes, oils in standard lipstick base

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
🪨

Talc contamination (asbestos trace)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitivizers

Limited concern

70

Lower risk for standard cosmetic without PFAS triggers, though brand makes no transparency claims.

Risky category by default

More lipstick grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.