PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
King Arthur Baking Natural Half-Sheet Baking Parchment Paper

Natural Value · Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

King Arthur Baking Natural Half-Sheet Baking Parchment Paper

Poor

Parchment paper coating origin unspecified; moderate PFAS risk remains uncertain.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified silicone/wax coating raises moderate PFAS concern; no other hazards established, but brand transparency is poor.

King Arthur's product uses a water-resistant coating on paper, likely silicone or wax-based. No PFAS disclosure or testing data publicly available, leaving risk level unconfirmed.

The safe swap

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

Seventh Generation

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper with silicone and/or wax coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified coating composition means non-fluorinated silicone or wax components could migrate into fatty or acidic foods under high heat; risk is typical for parchment but unquantified for this product.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Repeated use, creasing, or exposure to temperatures above manufacturer limits may cause the coating to flake; no durability data provided by brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Bleaching agents or optical brighteners in paper base

No public reports of concerning levels in King Arthur parchment; food-contact parchment is generally chlorine-free-processed or minimally bleached, but not independently verified here.

95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Parchment paper base is cellulose (not plastic), so microplastic risk is low unless silicone coating degrades into fine particles under extreme conditions, which is not documented.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

King Arthur Natural Half-Sheet Parchment is paper substrate coated with silicone and/or wax to create a non-stick, heat-resistant surface. The specific composition of the coating, whether it contains fluorinated compounds (PFAS) for durability or relies on non-fluorinated silicone, is not disclosed by the brand. Parchment paper is generally regarded as safe for oven use up to around 420-450°F, but coating integrity and leaching risk depend entirely on the coating chemistry, which remains opaque for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Natural Value (the manufacturer) does not publicly specify whether its parchment coating contains PFAS or disclose third-party testing. The brand has not issued statements addressing forever chemicals in its products, and no formal certifications (e.g., PFAS-free, compostable, or food-contact compliance audits) are prominently documented. This silence is notable in a category where competitors increasingly highlight non-fluorinated alternatives and transparent sourcing.

How it compares in its category

Parchment paper as a category carries inherent PFAS risk because manufacturers historically used fluorinated compounds to achieve heat and grease resistance. Some brands (e.g., If You Care, Unbleached Culprit) now market PFAS-free or certified compostable options with disclosed coatings. King Arthur's lack of specification places it in the middle-to-higher-risk segment of the parchment market; it offers no competitive transparency advantage over either budget or premium eco-labeled alternatives.

If you buy it

Use at temperatures below 420°F to minimize any risk of coating breakdown or volatile emissions. Do not reuse sheets excessively once creasing or wear becomes visible; degraded coating increases leaching potential. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to preserve coating integrity. Consider rotating to a verified PFAS-free brand if you bake frequently or want lower uncertainty.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Natural Value has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

Seventh Generation

Parchment Baking Sheets | 3 x 24 sheets

bleached paper with silicone coating

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
🫧

Silicone coating degradation and microparticles

Limited concern

70

Heat-induced breakdown of paper fibers

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. PFAS-free claim backed by MADE SAFE cert.

MADE SAFE

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Zulay Kitchen 200 Pcs Unbleached Non-Stick Baking Parchment Paper Sheets for Oven

Seventh Generation

Zulay Kitchen 200 Pcs Unbleached Non-Stick Baking Parchment Paper Sheets for Oven

unbleached cellulose paper, silicone coating

PFAS Grade50Good
Overall Grade38Poor

Silicone coating degradation at high heat

Limited concern

70
🍳

Migration of coating additives into fatty foods

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during handling or cooking

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Unbleached parchment with silicone coating; PFAS risk lower than conventional brands.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Parchment Paper Roll

Seventh Generation

Parchment Paper Roll

wood pulp with silicone-based coating

PFAS Grade50Good
Overall Grade42Poor

Silicone coating degradation under high heat

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ink or printing chemical migration

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Seventh Generation's PFAS-free claim is credible but unverified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More parchment paper & baking liners grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.