PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

· Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Poor

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant coating chemistry undisclosed; PFAS risk unconfirmed but likely. Other textile hazards minimal. Buy only if you accept unknown water-repellent coating treatment and commit to disclosure research before purchase.

New Balance does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Water-resistant jackets commonly use PFAS-based treatments; confirm coating details before purchase.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

90/ 100
♾️

PFAS

New Balance does not disclose whether the water-repellent coating is fluorinated (PFAS-based) or non-fluorinated. If non-fluorinated, alternative chemistries (polysiloxane, wax, hydrocarbon blends) are generally lower-risk but still poorly regulated. The unknown composition prevents full hazard assessment.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

All polyester or nylon windbreakers shed microfibers during washing. This jacket's synthetic construction means repeated laundering releases plastic particles into wastewater. Use of a wash bag or microfiber-capture filter reduces but does not eliminate shedding.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No specific recalls or public health alerts for formaldehyde in New Balance cycling jackets. Modern synthetic apparel typically undergoes formaldehyde-free finishing, especially for branded athletic wear, but is not universally guaranteed without certification documentation.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in color application

No known issues reported for this product. New Balance apparel is generally not associated with azo dye violations, and most branded athletic jackets meet international textile dye safety standards. Risk is low but unverified for this specific item.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

No public health alerts for New Balance cycling apparel. Modern polyester manufacturing in developed facilities typically uses antimony catalysts at regulated levels, but independent testing of this specific jacket is not on record.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses synthetic fabric (polyester or nylon blend typical for New Balance windbreakers) treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to shed water. The specific water-repellent coating chemistry is not publicly disclosed by New Balance, which is the core safety concern. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS compounds, though some manufacturers have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives. Without transparency from New Balance, the coating composition cannot be verified as safe.

The brand's record and disclosure

New Balance has not published a detailed water-repellent coating chemical disclosure policy or commitment to PFAS-free treatment for this product line. The company has faced criticism from environmental groups for lack of transparency on water-resistant coatings across its apparel. New Balance does hold some certifications (bluesign, Oeko-Tex) for other product lines, but specific certification status for this windbreaker is not readily available. Silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is a red flag in an industry where alternatives to PFAS now exist.

How it compares in its category

Men's cycling windbreakers with explicit PFAS-free or non-fluorinated water-repellent coating claims are increasingly available from competitors like Patagonia, Arc'teryx, and some direct-to-consumer brands. New Balance's lack of disclosure puts this jacket below the transparency standard of leading outdoor apparel makers. Price and fit may be competitive, but chemical safety communication is not. If water-repellent coating durability and water resistance are priorities, competitors openly specify their coating chemistry.

If you buy it

Before purchase, contact New Balance customer service directly to ask whether the water-repellent coating treatment contains PFAS or PFOA, and request the coating manufacturer's name. Wash separately from other garments in cold water to minimize microfiber shedding and any potential leaching of coating compounds. Avoid high-heat drying; air-dry to preserve the water-resistant layer and avoid thermal degradation of synthetic fibers. Replace when water beading noticeably declines, typically after 2-3 years of regular use; do not attempt to re-coat without confirming the safe chemistry of any aftermarket water-repellent coating product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.