PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
New Balance Men's Fast Days Jacket

New Balance · Cycling Rain Jackets

New Balance Men's Fast Days Jacket

Bad

Typical athletic jacket; no PFAS disclosure or testing available.

Verdict: SkipTypical synthetic athletic jacket with silent PFAS use and standard textile hazards; acceptable if cared for properly and heat-treated before first wear.

New Balance does not disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating treatment chemistry for this jacket. Standard sportswear with water-resistant coating carries typical PFAS risk until proven otherwise.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic shell with water-repellent coating, lining unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The jacket carries a 'Bad' PFAS grade (20/100). Synthetic water-repellent coating finishes commonly use fluorinated compounds; New Balance has not disclosed alternatives, making PFAS presence statistically probable in this product.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing

New synthetic shells and dyes can release VOCs during manufacturing and early wear. No specific test data is available for this jacket, but off-gassing is typical in untreated synthetic apparel and diminishes with washing.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication

Over time, water-repellent coating finishes wear off with washing and wear. Reapplication products (often aerosol) may introduce additional chemicals; New Balance does not specify approved refresh methods or timing.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

No specific recalls or violations are on record for New Balance colorants. Standard industry testing suggests low risk, but unspecified lining and dye sourcing mean full chemical disclosure is unavailable.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are rare in athletic shell garments but can appear in blend linings. The lining is not specified; risk is low but cannot be ruled out without material disclosure.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Fast Days Jacket uses a synthetic shell (likely polyester or polyester blend) treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to shed moisture. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS chemistry; New Balance has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses fluorocarbon-free alternatives, making PFAS presence likely. The lining material is unspecified, which limits assessment of full chemical exposure. Synthetic shells can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and early wear, particularly when new.

The brand's record and disclosure

New Balance has not issued public commitments to phase out PFAS in apparel or disclosed testing results for this product line. The company maintains general sustainability messaging but lacks transparent chemical disclosure policies common among premium athletic brands. No major safety recalls or formaldehyde violations are on record for New Balance apparel. This silence suggests reliance on industry-standard practices rather than advanced safety measures.

How it compares in its category

This jacket sits in the mainstream athletic segment where water-repellent coating coatings are standard and PFAS use is widespread and undisclosed. Competitors like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have committed to PFAS alternatives and disclose test results; New Balance does not. Most comparable price-point jackets (under $200) lack equivalent transparency. If PFAS minimization is a priority, this product offers no competitive advantage over peers.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket separately in cold water before first wear to reduce VOC off-gassing and any residual dyes or finishes. Avoid high heat when drying (air dry preferred) as synthetic shells degrade under sustained heat and water-repellent coating coatings can break down. Do not dry-clean, as solvents can damage the water-repellent finish and increase chemical exposure. Replace if the water-repellent coating visibly fails (water beads disappear) or seams show damage; do not attempt heat reactivation without manufacturer guidance.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
New Balance has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.