PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
New Balance Women's RC Jacket

New Balance · Cycling Rain Jackets

New Balance Women's RC Jacket

Bad

No public PFAS disclosure. water-repellent coating jackets often use PFAS; avoid if concerned.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic jacket with likely PFAS-based water-repellent coating finish; acceptable if PFAS concern is secondary and garment is worn sparingly, washed infrequently.

New Balance has not publicly disclosed PFAS content in this RC jacket. Most water-repellent coating-treated athletic jackets contain PFAS-based water repellents unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic textile with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Synthetic jackets with water-repellent coating finishes typically use PFAS-based chemistry unless explicitly certified otherwise; New Balance provides no disclosure. Exposure occurs primarily during manufacturing and via washing; direct skin contact risk during wear is lower but not eliminated.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester base fabric

If the jacket base fabric is polyester (likely for this category), antimony trioxide may be used as a catalyst in polymer production. Most antimony remains bound in the polymer matrix and poses negligible risk during normal wear, but this is not specific to New Balance.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during washing

Synthetic jackets shed microfibers when washed; frequency and quantity increase as the water-repellent coating and fabric degrade. This is a general environmental concern rather than a direct health hazard, but relevant to long-term lifecycle impact.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

New Balance products are not known to have azo dye violations on record, and synthetic fabrics used in athletic wear are generally subject to informal industry screening. No specific testing data for this jacket model is available.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern synthetic apparel production typically uses low-formaldehyde or formaldehyde-free finishing processes. No public record of formaldehyde issues in New Balance athletic jackets exists, though full disclosure would require independent testing.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The RC Jacket is constructed from synthetic textile (likely polyester or nylon blend) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings are chemical treatments designed to bead water without creating a waterproof membrane, and historically most commercial water-repellent coating finishes relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to achieve this water-repellency. The synthetic base fabric itself is generally stable when worn, but the water-repellent coating degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing treated particles or residues.

The brand's record and disclosure

New Balance has not made public commitments to eliminate PFAS from apparel water-repellent coating treatments as of available records, and the company does not disclose the specific chemical composition of finishes used in products like this jacket. The brand maintains general sustainability messaging but has not addressed PFAS in synthetic clothing specifically. Without independent testing or third-party certification (such as Bluesign or OEKO-TEX Standard 100 limiting PFAS), there is no verification of the water-repellent coating chemistry in this product.

How it compares in its category

Most mass-market synthetic jackets with water-repellent coating finishes carry identical PFAS uncertainty unless explicitly certified otherwise; New Balance does not distinguish itself in this respect. Premium brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have moved toward fluorine-free water-repellent coating or transparent sourcing; budget and mid-tier brands, including New Balance, typically do not provide this information. If PFAS exposure from apparel is a personal priority, certified PFAS-free alternatives exist but are often more expensive and less widely available.

If you buy it

Minimize potential exposure by wearing the jacket in dry conditions when possible and limiting washing frequency, as each wash cycle degrades the water-repellent coating finish and may release residues. Wash separately in cold water on gentle cycles to slow coating breakdown; avoid dry cleaning if possible. Do not tumble dry on high heat, which can accelerate fabric and coating degradation. Monitor for visible coating wear (loss of water beading) and retire the jacket once water-repellent coating performance visibly declines, rather than attempting re-treatment.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
New Balance has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.