PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
Nike Men's Repel Miler Running Jacket

Nike · Cycling Rain Jackets

Nike Men's Repel Miler Running Jacket

Bad

water-repellent coating treatment status unclear. PFAS risk uncertain without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipPFAS in water-repellent coating finish is primary concern; polyester base carries standard textile hazards. Nike has not disclosed treatment details. Manageable with informed use.

Nike's Repel Miler uses water-repellent coating for water repellency but provides no PFAS transparency. Composition of water-repellent treatment unspecified, leaving risk profile unconfirmed.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

water-repellent coating finishes sometimes incorporate formaldehyde-releasing resins as crosslinkers. Nike does not disclose whether this jacket uses such chemistry. Off-gassing risk is minimal after initial manufacture and washing but cannot be ruled out without material data.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during wash and wear

Polyester garments, especially those with coatings, release microfibers during laundering. This is an environmental rather than direct health hazard but is well-established for synthetic athletic wear and worsens with mechanical washing.

45/ 100
💨

water-repellent coating degradation and inhalation

As water-repellent coating finishes break down with use and washing, aerosolized particles may be shed. If the coating contains PFAS, this represents a secondary exposure route. Nike's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry prevents assessment of this specific risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and colorfast integrity

No recalls or published testing indicate azo dye toxicity in this model. Polyester dyes in athletic wear are typically azo-free or low-risk, but no independent verification for this specific product is on record.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony is used as a polyester catalyst in production and can remain as trace residue. No brand-specific data or health incident reports exist for Nike apparel; levels are typically below regulatory concern in finished garments.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings on athletic apparel have historically relied on PFAS-based chemistry, though some brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives. Nike has not publicly disclosed whether this Repel Miler uses legacy PFAS compounds or newer PFAS-free formulations. Polyester itself is a synthetic polymer with a low direct toxicity profile but can release microfibers during washing and wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has made limited public commitments on PFAS phase-out across its apparel line and has not released a comprehensive inventory of which products contain PFAS-based water-repellent coating. The company has not provided test reports or third-party certifications for this specific jacket. Nike's environmental reporting does not routinely disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the actual PFAS exposure risk of this product.

How it compares in its category

Running jackets with water-repellent finishes are common, and most major brands face the same water-repellent coating disclosure gap. Some competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) have publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclosed testing; others including Nike remain silent. If PFAS-free water-repellent coating is your priority, this jacket offers no assurance over alternatives unless you contact Nike directly for material safety data.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid high heat drying, which can stress synthetic fibers and potentially accelerate water-repellent coating breakdown. Expect the water-repellent finish to diminish after 30-50 washes regardless of PFAS status. Do not expose to flame or direct heat sources. If water-repellent coating treatment toxicity is a concern, contact Nike customer service to request technical data on this specific product batch before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.