PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Nike Storm Fit Jacket Cycling Running

Nike · Cycling Rain Jackets

Nike Storm Fit Jacket Cycling Running

Bad

water-repellent coating treatment likely contains PFAS. Nike provides no disclosure.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic jacket with likely PFAS-based water repellent; no major non-PFAS hazards reported, but Nike's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry and poor PFAS stance warrant cautious use.

Nike's Storm Fit uses standard water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish, typically PFAS-based, with no public PFAS commitment or testing transparency. No third-party verification available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polyester/nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Polyester synthesis can involve antimony trioxide as a catalyst. Residual antimony in finished fabric is generally very low and migration to skin is not well-documented, but some activist groups flag it as a concern in synthetic textiles. Nike does not publish antimony testing data.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and leaching

Conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings will gradually degrade with washing and wear, potentially releasing fluorinated chemicals into wastewater and the environment. Personal skin exposure from a garment is lower risk than environmental release, but indoor washing contributes to household PFAS load.

20/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polyester and nylon shed microfibers when worn and washed, especially if the fabric is physically abraded. Storm Fit jackets are typically tight weaves, which reduces shedding, but washing still contributes to microplastic release into water systems.

Source: EPA
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes

Nike's polyester athletic wear is not known to contain restricted azo dyes based on public recalls or testing. No specific concern on record for this model.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and nylon do not typically require formaldehyde-based resins for water repellency. water-repellent coating coatings use fluorinated or non-fluorinated polymers, not formaldehyde. No established risk for this product.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester and nylon blended with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings shed water but have historically relied on fluorinated chemicals (PFAS) to work effectively. Nike has not disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry for this model. Polyester and nylon themselves are stable synthetics with low leaching risk in normal wear, but the coating is the primary concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has faced sustained criticism for environmental PFAS pollution at manufacturing sites and has not committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternatives across its apparel line, despite competitors publishing transition timelines. The company does not provide chemical disclosure on product tags or websites for water-repellent treatments. This opacity is the main red flag; it suggests either continued PFAS use or lack of supply-chain transparency.

How it compares in its category

Most major athletic brands still use conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments on technical outerwear. Some competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, Salewa) have publicly committed to PFAS-free alternatives or fluorocarbon-free finishes, though cost is higher. Nike's Storm Fit is mid-to-premium priced but offers no transparency advantage over cheaper alternatives, which weakens its value proposition if PFAS exposure is a concern.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water without fabric softener to preserve the water-repellent coating and minimize any potential leaching during laundering. Air dry; do not tumble dry or iron, as heat can degrade coatings and increase chemical migration. The water-repellent coating finish will wear down over 50-100 washes; replacement of the jacket rather than re-treatment is the safer path. Consider this a consumable garment with a 2-3 year lifespan under regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.