PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Women's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm-FIT ADV Jacket

Nike · Cycling Rain Jackets

Women's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm-FIT ADV Jacket

Bad

Skip. water-repellent coating likely contains PFAS; no brand disclosure.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-treated water-repellent coating plus Nike's opaque chemical disclosure create unacceptable uncertainty for a water-repellent garment worn close to skin.

Nike's ACG Phantazma uses waterproof Storm-FIT treatment on synthetic fabric, typical of modern water-repellent coating coatings that often contain PFAS. Nike provides no public disclosure on PFAS content or safer alternatives for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester nylon blend with Storm-FIT water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Storm-FIT water-repellent coating is not publicly disclosed as PFAS-free. Most polyester athletic apparel water-repellent coating finishes remain fluorinated; degradation or wash-out may release these compounds over the jacket's lifetime.

Source: EPA
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast stability

Polyester-nylon blends are routinely dyed with azo dyes, some of which can release aromatic amines if degraded by perspiration or washing. No specific violation is recorded for Nike, but the hazard is inherent to synthetic textile dyeing.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Water-repellent and wrinkle-resistant finishes on synthetic blends sometimes include formaldehyde-releasing resins. Nike's process documentation is not publicly available, so residual formaldehyde cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during laundering

Polyester-nylon garments shed microplastics with each wash. While not a direct toxicity hazard to the wearer, this is an environmental and secondary ingestion concern relevant to outdoor apparel categories.

45/ 100
🏷️

Brand disclosure transparency and third-party verification gaps

Nike's refusal to specify whether Storm-FIT is PFAS-free or to pursue OEKO-TEX certification for this product line prevents independent safety validation. Purchasing commits you to an unverified chemical profile.

20/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is a polyester-nylon blend with Storm-FIT water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. The water-repellent coating finish is the critical safety concern: these coatings are conventionally PFAS-based (fluorinated compounds that bond to fabric to create water-beading). The base polyester-nylon weave itself is chemically stable, but the applied coating is where chemical leaching and skin contact risks concentrate. Storm-FIT is Nike's proprietary technology; independent testing of its exact fluorine-free status is not publicly available.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has not published detailed chemical composition data or third-party certifications (like OEKO-TEX or bluesign) for Storm-FIT products. The company has faced criticism for opacity on water-repellent coating chemistry across its apparel lines. While Nike committed to phasing PFAS by 2025 in some product categories, this commitment does not cover all garments, and verification mechanisms remain limited. No recall or known contamination event has been publicly documented for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Performance outdoor jackets in this price range typically use PFAS-based water-repellent coating or proprietary fluorinated treatments. Some competitors (Arc'teryx, Patagonia on select lines) now disclose PFAS-free or fluorine-free water-repellent coating options, though at premium cost. Nike's lack of transparency on Storm-FIT chemistry places this jacket below brands that publish full composition data or certifications. Most alternative water-repellent coating jackets still contain PFAS; truly PFAS-free options are rare in water-repellent apparel.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water; avoid machine drying (heat can accelerate coating breakdown and potential leaching). Do not apply additional water-repellent coating treatments, as layering fluorinated products increases exposure. Replace the jacket if the water-repellent coating visibly peels, flakes, or loses water-beading ability, as degraded coatings may release trapped chemicals. Minimize extended skin contact if you have known sensitivity to fluorinated compounds or fragmented azo dyes sometimes present in synthetic textiles.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.