PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall36/ 100Poor
Callaway Tour Authentic Golf Glove Men

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Tour Authentic Golf Glove Men

Poor

Probable water-repellent coating present; PFAS risk unconfirmed by brand.

Verdict · SkipLeather palm golf glove with minimal established hazards; water-repellent coating introduces uncertain PFAS risk but product falls within category norms.

Premium leather palm with synthetic backing and water-repellent coating treatment. Callaway doesn't disclose PFAS status.

The better-graded swap

Nike Golf Ball

Nike Golf

Nike Golf Ball

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm, synthetic/textile back with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Callaway/Odyssey has not disclosed whether the water-repellent coating treatment uses legacy PFAS or newer non-PFAS chemistry. Golf glove water-repellent coating coatings are a known application of PFAS historically, though migration into skin contact is limited during normal wear.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Chromium (leather tanning residue)

Standard leather golf gloves typically use chromium or vegetable tanning. Residual chromium levels in well-made leather are generally controlled; no recalls or safety notices specific to Odyssey gloves suggest established harm, though direct skin contact over extended periods remains theoretical route of concern.

95/ 100

Synthetic textile back off-gassing or dye stability

The polyester or nylon blend back may off-gas volatile organics or release synthetic dyes during initial use or when wet. No published data specific to Odyssey gloves; risk is consistent with general textile manufacturing standards and dissipates with wear.

95/ 100

Azo dyes in synthetic components

Textile back may contain azo dyes; restricted azo dyes are banned in most apparel but enforcement in golf accessories is less stringent. No evidence of non-compliant dyes in Odyssey products, but disclosure is absent.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove combines a genuine leather palm (typically treated for water resistance and durability) with a synthetic textile back, likely polyester or nylon blend. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish on the back is the primary chemical concern; water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds, though modern formulations increasingly use non-PFAS alternatives. Leather itself undergoes chromium or vegetable tanning and may receive additional finishing treatments, but standard golf glove leather poses minimal acute hazard if no visible coating degradation occurs.

The brand's record and disclosure

Odyssey (owned by Callaway Golf) has not publicly disclosed PFAS use or testing results for this specific glove or its water-repellent coating treatment. The brand does not appear on major PFAS-conscious retailer certification lists (e.g., Bluesign, GOTS for apparel). No recalls or specific safety warnings for Odyssey golf gloves are on record. Without proactive transparency, the water-repellent coating chemistry remains a black box, though this silence is typical across most golf equipment manufacturers.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves as a category receive minimal regulatory scrutiny compared to clothing or footwear. Most competitors use identical or nearly identical leather-plus-synthetic construction with water-repellent coating coatings. A small number of premium brands (e.g., some high-end European makers) offer PFAS-free or certified alternatives, but they command significantly higher prices. Odyssey's positioning is mid-market mainstream with no special environmental or safety differentiation claimed.

If you buy it

Wash by hand in cool water with mild soap after use to extend glove life and minimize exposure to treatment chemicals. Avoid hot water, bleach, or machine washing, which can degrade the coating and potentially mobilize leachables. Replace when palm leather shows visible wear, cracking, or loss of grip (typically 1-2 seasons of regular play). Store in a dry place; do not expose to direct heat or sunlight for prolonged periods.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.