PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Puma Evercushion Plus insoles poron red

Puma · Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Puma Evercushion Plus insoles poron red

Poor

Avoid. Puma provides no PFAS disclosure for this insole.

Verdict · SkipPoron foam insoles carry low established toxicity risk, but Puma's silence on PFAS and lack of transparency on chemical treatments warrant cautious use with attention to replacement cycles.

Poron is a polyurethane foam used in cushioning, not inherently PFAS-prone, but Puma discloses nothing about PFAS or coatings applied to this insole.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Poron foam (polyurethane-based cushioning)

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Puma Evercushion Plus insoles poron red is made of, ingredients and materials

Poron is a closed-cell polyurethane foam engineered for cushioning and impact absorption. The red coloring suggests addition of pigments or dyes to the base foam material. Polyurethane foams used in insoles are generally stable under normal foot-contact conditions, but the formulation details (cross-linking agents, flame retardants, colorants) are not disclosed by Puma and vary by supplier. No widespread safety incidents have been documented for Poron insoles specifically, though the material's chemical composition remains proprietary.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
💨

Polyurethane foam degradation and off-gassing

Poron insoles may emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and early use, particularly when warm or compressed. This risk is inherent to polyurethane foam and typically mild in closed-cell formulations, but Puma does not disclose cure times or residual solvent content.

70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorant leachability

The red pigmentation suggests synthetic colorants; no public data confirms whether these are azo-dye based or azo-free. If azo-based dyes are present, prolonged moisture and heat exposure could release aromatic amines, though skin contact risk is low given the barrier of footwear.

70/ 100
🏷️

Flame retardants

Many polyurethane foam insoles incorporate flame retardants for compliance with flammability standards; Puma does not disclose whether brominated, chlorinated, or non-halogenated types are used. While insoles are not a primary dermal contact surface, cumulative chemical exposure over months of use cannot be ruled out.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Moisture retention and microbial growth

Closed-cell foam is less prone to bacterial colonization than open-cell types, but moisture entrapment in insoles can still promote odor-causing bacteria and fungi if insoles are not dried regularly. This is a hygiene rather than toxicological hazard but relevant to product maintenance.

70/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Insole durability is often enhanced by water-resistant treatments that may contain legacy PFAS (PFOA, PFOS) or newer alternatives (GenX, PFBA). Puma's complete silence on this issue creates uncertainty; many foam insole manufacturers have not disclosed their formulations or publicly committed to transitioning away from PFAS-containing materials.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma has faced criticism for limited chemical transparency across its product lines and has not published comprehensive hazardous substance policies comparable to competitors like Adidas or Nike. The company provides no publicly available information on PFAS content, flame retardants, or processing chemicals in this insole. No product recalls for Puma Evercushion insoles appear on record. Puma holds no major third-party certifications (e.g., Oeko-Tex, Bluesign) for this category of accessory.

How it compares in its category

Insole hazard profiles depend heavily on material (polyurethane, EVA, gel, natural rubber) and manufacturing transparency. Poron-based insoles are mid-range in disclosure practices compared to premium alternatives (some brands certify chemical safety) and mass-market competitors. The lack of PFAS transparency is a notable gap, as water-resistant insole foams sometimes contain PFAS to enhance durability. This product does not stand out negatively on non-PFAS metrics but offers no compensating certifications or guarantees.

If you buy it

Replace insoles every 6-12 months depending on activity level and moisture exposure, as cushioning degradation and moisture retention increase chemical leachability risk over time. Avoid prolonged storage in heat or direct sunlight, which can accelerate foam breakdown. Wash feet after wear if the red dye transfers onto skin (unlikely but worth monitoring). If you have sensitive skin or respiratory sensitivity to polyurethane off-gassing, test with short wearing periods first.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Puma Evercushion Plus insoles poron red?

Cotton Insole

Cotton Insole

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton with possible latex or synthetic backing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Adhesive/backing composition (unknown)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Ortholite cushioning foam, polyurethane base
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyurethane

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • EVA foam, mesh textile lining
  • Azo dyes in mesh textile

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.