PUMA Men's Run Ultraweave Raincell Jacket
Water-repellent jacket with no PFAS disclosure from the brand.
The Raincell coating provides durable water repellency. Puma has no PFAS statement on record for this product. water-repellent coating-treated apparel has historically used PFAS-based chemistry, though some alternatives exist.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
polyester blend with Raincell water-repellent coating
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What PUMA Men's Run Ultraweave Raincell Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials
This jacket is a polyester blend with a proprietary Raincell water-repellent coating. Polyester itself is petroleum-derived and stable when worn, but the added water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating is the chemical concern here. Raincell's exact formulation is not publicly disclosed, which prevents clear assessment of whether it contains legacy PFAS (like PFOA) or newer alternatives. The coating's durability and potential to shed microfibers under washing are secondary considerations.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Raincell coating may contain formaldehyde-release compounds used in water-repellent treatments on polyester. Off-gassing risk is typically minimal during wear but can occur during manufacturing and storage.
Source, ATSDR ↗Antimony in polyester fiber
Polyester may contain antimony trioxide as a processing catalyst. No evidence of elevated levels in Puma products specifically, but levels are not independently verified for this garment.
Azo dyes (if color-dyed)
Depending on dye batch and color, polyester garments can contain azo dyes that break down into carcinogenic amines under specific conditions. Puma does not publicly disclose azo-dye screening; regulatory compliance (e.g., REACH) is assumed but not confirmed for this style.
Coating degradation and microplastic shedding
Water-repellent coating coatings on polyester shed microfibers, especially after repeated washing. Washing releases these particles into wastewater; exact quantity from Raincell treatment not tested publicly but is consistent with industry norm.
PFAS
Raincell is a proprietary finish; PUMA has not disclosed whether it contains PFAS, PFAS alternatives, or other fluorinated compounds. This opacity prevents full hazard assessment and is the primary chemical concern for this product.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Puma has not published transparent information about PFAS use in their water-repellent treatments or made commitments to phase out legacy chemicals. The brand does not appear in public databases of companies with formal PFAS elimination roadmaps. While Puma holds various sustainability certifications for labor and general environmental impact, chemical transparency in apparel finishes remains limited. This silence around water-repellent coating composition is typical across the athletic apparel industry but creates a transparency gap for consumers.
How it compares in its category
Most rain jackets from major brands use some form of water-repellent coating, and most do not disclose PFAS status clearly. Puma's approach is neither distinctly better nor worse than competitors like Nike or Adidas in this regard. A small number of brands (e.g.Patagonia has committed to using alternatives to PFAS-based water repellents, though these remain niche. Price and performance of this jacket sit in the mainstream athletic segment; the chemical risk profile is industry-standard, not elevated.
If you buy it
Wash in cool water and avoid heat drying, which can stress the coating and increase microfiber shedding. Expect the water-repellent finish to degrade within 2-3 years of regular use; re-proofing products (often PFAS-containing themselves) may extend life but introduce additional chemical exposure. Do not expose the jacket to prolonged heat or flames, as polyester can melt and coating degradation may release volatile compounds. Store in a cool, dry place and inspect seams and coating annually for visible wear.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Puma has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to PUMA Men's Run Ultraweave Raincell Jacket?
- polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Azo dyes and color fastness
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- PFAS
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore cycling rain jackets grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.