PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Puma Mens All Weather Regular Jacket

Puma · Cycling Rain Jackets

Puma Mens All Weather Regular Jacket

Bad

Waterproof jackets often use PFAS; Puma discloses nothing. Higher caution.

Verdict · SkipPolyester water-repellent coating jacket with undisclosed water treatment (likely PFAS) and unknown dye/finish chemistry. Buy only if PFAS concern is acceptable; practice cautious care.

All-weather jackets typically receive water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings that historically contain PFAS. Puma provides no public disclosure of PFAS status, treatment method, or certifications for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-resistant treatment (water-repellent coating)

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Puma Mens All Weather Regular Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

This jacket is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer shell. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS chemistry, though some brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives; Puma's silence on which treatment is used here creates uncertainty. Polyester itself is stable under normal wear, but the applied finish is the primary chemical exposure point. The inner lining (if any) and dyes used in production are additional potential sources of concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester fabric

Polyester textiles can be dyed with azo dyes, some of which break down into carcinogenic amines. No specific testing of this Puma jacket is publicly available; risk depends on dye supplier and sourcing practices, which Puma does not disclose.

70/ 100
⏳

water-repellent coating finish degradation and microleaching

As the jacket ages and is washed, the water-repellent coating gradually breaks down and may shed microparticles or leach finish components into wash water. If PFAS-based (most likely), repeated washing accelerates low-level exposure over the garment's lifetime.

20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester apparel sometimes uses formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or fabric stiffening. Puma does not specify finishing chemistry; risk is present but unquantified for this specific product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed chemical treatments and finishes

Puma does not publicly itemize chemical inputs for this product line. Other brands' waterproof jackets have been found to retain PFAS residues; absence of disclosure for Puma products prevents verification of compliance with stricter standards.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester production and can be present in trace amounts. No evidence of antimony leaching from polyester outerwear under normal wear has been established, and Puma has no known record of elevated antimony in finished garments.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water treatments or disclosed the chemistry of its water-repellent coating finishes for this product line. The brand maintains minimal transparency on chemical use in apparel compared to competitors like Patagonia or The North Face, both of which explicitly market PFAS-free options. No major recalls or contamination incidents have been attributed to Puma outerwear, but the lack of disclosure is a red flag for informed purchasing.

How it compares in its category

Men's polyester waterproof jackets are ubiquitous and most use traditional PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments unless marketed otherwise. Puma's silence puts this product in the middle of the pack, neither publicly identified as having lower PFAS concern nor flagged as a worst actor. Brands explicitly offering PFAS-free options (Fjallraven, some Marmot lines) exist at similar price points and should be preferred if PFAS avoidance is a priority. This jacket offers no meaningful advantage over alternatives in terms of disclosed chemical safety.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and use cool water with mild detergent to minimize water-repellent coating finish degradation and potential leaching. Avoid dry cleaning, which may accelerate coating breakdown. Do not tumble dry; air dry flat or on a hanger away from direct heat. Expect the water-repellent coating finish to weaken after 20-30 washes; re-treatment products exist but add another layer of chemical exposure. If PFAS concern matters to you, contact Puma directly or choose a brand with explicit PFAS-free certification.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Puma Mens All Weather Regular Jacket?

Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Azo dyes and color fastness

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Trail Craft Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Trail Craft Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.