PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Men's Reebok Pullover Dobby Jacket

Reebok · Cycling Rain Jackets

Men's Reebok Pullover Dobby Jacket

Bad

Waterproof jackets commonly use PFAS. No brand disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-treated polyester dobby jacket with undisclosed water repellent chemistry; acceptable if laundering protocol followed, problematic if PFAS exposure is priority.

Reebok has not publicly disclosed PFAS use or avoidance in this jacket. water-repellent coating-finished apparel typically contains legacy PFAS; request detailed fabric spec from retailer for certainty.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester dobby weave with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Polyester jackets treated with water-repellent coating commonly contain PFAS compounds. Reebok does not disclose finish chemistry, and the product carries a low PFAS safety grade (20/100). Exposure occurs primarily through skin contact and inhalation during wear; laundering may release finish chemicals into wastewater.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester fibers sometimes contain antimony as a catalyst residue from polymerization. Levels in finished garments are typically low and not considered a dermal hazard during normal wear, but antimony can leach slightly if fabric is heated excessively or placed in contact with acidic or basic solutions.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dobby weave garments may receive formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist or sizing finishes to maintain crispness and dimensional stability. These are typically removed during first wash, but initial skin contact before laundering could cause irritation in sensitive individuals. Reebok does not publish finish specifications for this line.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from synthetic polymer

All polyester textiles shed microfibers during laundering. This jacket, being a densely woven dobby, sheds at typical rates for polyester apparel. Microfiber pollution is an environmental hazard rather than direct consumer toxicity, but fibers can be inhaled during handling or laundering.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and colorant stability

No specific recalls or safety alerts on record for this product or Reebok apparel relating to azo dyes or banned dyes. Polyester takes dyes well and standard manufacturers test for prohibited azo compounds, but independent testing of this specific jacket is not available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester dobby weave, a densely woven synthetic textile that provides structure and durability. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface is the key concern: such finishes on casual apparel commonly use PFAS-based compounds (perfluorinated chemicals) to bond water-shedding properties to fibers. Polyester itself is chemically stable once woven, but the coating layer can degrade with washing and wear, potentially releasing finish chemicals over the garment's lifetime.

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments or disclosed the specific chemistry of finishes used on this product line. The brand maintains general sustainability messaging but does not appear on lists of apparel makers that have phased out PFAS in water repellents (unlike some competitors such as Patagonia or Arc'teryx). Without explicit transparency, the PFAS content of the finish cannot be verified at purchase.

How it compares in its category

Most affordable casual water-repellent jackets in this price range use PFAS-based water-repellent coating; this Reebok product is typical, not exceptional. Higher-cost outdoor brands increasingly offer PFAS-free alternatives using wax or silicone-based repellents, but at 2-3x the cost. Budget apparel makers (including Reebok at this tier) have not widely adopted such alternatives, making this product representative of industry standard practice rather than a laggard.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water and air-dry to minimize water-repellent coating degradation and fiber shedding. Do not dry-clean; solvents can strip and concentrate finishes. Expect the water repellency to fade over 20-40 washes; reapplication products exist but introduce additional chemical exposure. If you have concerns about PFAS, consider durability: a long-lasting jacket reduces lifecycle chemical exposure versus replacing a cheaper, shorter-lived piece.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.