PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Reebok Anorak Windbreaker Jacket Men's

Reebok · Cycling Rain Jackets

Reebok Anorak Windbreaker Jacket Men's

Bad

Windbreaker likely has water-repellent coating; Reebok silent on PFAS use.

Verdict: SkipPolyester windbreaker with probable PFAS-based water-resistant coating; acceptable for occasional use with attention to care and replacement cycles.

Anorak jackets typically use water-resistant finishes that may contain PFAS. Reebok provides no public disclosure of PFAS avoidance or treatment details for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant polyester outerwear in this price/brand tier overwhelmingly uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating chemistry. Reebok's silence on this is consistent with industry standard non-disclosure, making fluorinated compound presence highly probable though not confirmed by brand statement.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from coating degradation

Polyester textiles with water-repellent coating coatings shed microfibers during washing; the coating itself breaks down into smaller particles over repeated use and laundering. This is a documented environmental and potential inhalation hazard, not specific to Reebok but inherent to coated polyester.

45/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is a standard catalyst in polyester synthesis and remains as trace residue in finished fiber. Reebok does not disclose antimony levels; exposure risk is primarily occupational, not consumer-facing in normal wear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester dyeing

No specific recalls or warnings exist for azo dye use in Reebok apparel. Polyester dyeing can involve azo chemistry, but regulated brands typically avoid carcinogenic azo compounds; no evidence suggests Reebok deviates from mainstream practice.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde resins are rare in polyester outerwear compared to cotton or blended goods. No recalls or reports indicate Reebok uses formaldehyde-containing finishes in this product category.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester with a water-resistant (likely water-repellent coating) surface coating. Polyester itself is stable and does not leach significantly under normal wear. The coating applied to achieve water repellency is the material of concern; such coatings in budget-to-mid-tier outdoor apparel typically contain fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve durable water repellency. This coating degrades over time with washing and wear, releasing microfibers and potentially breaking down to smaller chemical components.

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or transparency in apparel manufacturing. The company does not disclose which water-repellent coating chemistries are used in water-resistant products. No established safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye violations are on record for Reebok apparel, and polyester production itself does not typically involve these hazards. However, the silence on PFAS use is notable given industry movement toward fluorine-free alternatives by competitors.

How it compares in its category

Mid-tier outdoor jackets commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings unless explicitly labeled otherwise (such as 'PFOA-free' or 'fluorine-free'). Reebok's stance and lack of labeling place this product in the mainstream category without visible differentiation. Brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have begun disclosing or transitioning to fluorine-free water repellency, making them lower-risk alternatives if PFAS exposure is a priority.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cool water and air dry to slow coating degradation and minimize microfiber shedding. Do not dry clean or use fabric softeners. Expect the water-resistant coating to noticeably diminish after 20-30 wash cycles. Replace the jacket when water no longer beads on the surface rather than retreating it with aftermarket water-repellent coating sprays, which often contain additional PFAS. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.