Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket
Typical athletic jacket; water-repellent coating likely contains PFAS. No brand disclosure.
Reebok does not disclose PFAS use or avoidance for this jacket. Standard water-repellent coating-treated sportswear often uses PFAS-based water repellents; brand transparency is absent here.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyester/nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Polyester athletic jackets with water-repellent coating finishes are presumed to contain PFAS unless manufacturer explicitly certifies otherwise. Reebok provides no disclosure on this jacket's water-repellent coating chemistry, making fluorinated compounds the most probable formulation.
Source: ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Polyester textiles, especially darker colors, may contain azo dyes or pigments with trace heavy metals (cadmium, lead) from dyeing processes. No specific recalls or testing for this Reebok product exist, but risk is inherent to synthetic fiber dyeing at this manufacturing tier.
Source: FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Polyester and nylon fabrics sometimes receive formaldehyde-based finishes for wrinkle resistance or crease retention, though modern athletic wear often avoids this due to regulatory pressure. Reebok does not disclose finishing chemistry for this jacket.
Source: ATSDR ↗Microplastic shedding
All synthetic textiles shed microfibers during washing; polyester/nylon blends release particles that accumulate in aquatic systems. This is a systemic problem across the category, not specific to Reebok, but relevant to lifecycle impact.
What’s reassuring
Antimony in polyester fiber
Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester production and may remain as trace residue in finished fiber. No specific testing or concern has been documented for Reebok apparel, and leaching from polyester worn on skin is negligible under normal conditions.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This jacket is a polyester/nylon blend, common synthetic materials chosen for water resistance and durability in athletic wear. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric is the primary chemical concern: these coatings historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to repel water, though some newer formulations use non-fluorinated alternatives. Polyester and nylon themselves are thermoplastic polymers generally stable at normal wearing temperatures, but the finishing chemistry is where toxicological risk concentrates. Reebok has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatment.
The brand's record and disclosure
Reebok has not established a public commitment to PFAS elimination in textiles or athletic apparel, and does not disclose chemical composition of water-repellent treatments on product labels or sustainability pages. The brand has faced limited scrutiny compared to outdoor brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) that have published PFAS phase-out roadmaps. No major recalls or chemical controversies specific to Reebok athletic jackets are on record, but silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is common across mid-tier sportswear manufacturers. This jacket should be assumed to contain PFAS-treated water-repellent coating unless explicitly stated otherwise.
How it compares in its category
Reebok jackets occupy the mid-market athletic-casual segment where PFAS-containing water-repellent coating finishes remain the industry norm; premium outdoor brands have begun transitioning to PFAS-free alternatives, but most mass-market synthetic jackets still use fluorinated coatings. This product's silence on chemical inputs is typical rather than exceptional for the price point and distribution channel. If you prioritize low PFAS exposure, brands with published PFAS-free water-repellent coating certification (like some Patagonia styles or specialty outdoor brands) offer alternatives, though at higher cost. Standard polyester jackets without water-repellent treatment eliminate water-repellent coating chemistry altogether but sacrifice weather protection.
If you buy it
Wash separately from other garments on cool cycles to minimize potential leaching of finish chemicals into household water; avoid hot water or prolonged soaking. Do not dry clean, as solvents can degrade or mobilize coating chemicals. Expect water repellency to diminish over 20-30 washes as the water-repellent coating layer naturally wears; reapplication products (often PFAS-containing) are available but introduce fresh chemical exposure. The jacket is safe to wear as a garment; the primary concern is environmental and systemic exposure through repeated washing and eventual disposal, not dermal absorption during normal use.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Reebok has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets
Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant
Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified
PFAS
Limited concern
Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric
Limited concern
Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
More cycling rain jackets grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.