PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket, Sizes Xs-5xl, Black

Reebok · Cycling Rain Jackets

Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket, Sizes Xs-5xl, Black

Bad

Kinetic jacket likely water-repellent coating-coated; coating chemistry not disclosed.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating presents PFAS concern; no major other textile hazards established for Reebok apparel, but durability and care matter.

Reebok provides no PFAS information for this jacket. Water-resistant apparel often uses PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments, but brand silence prevents confirmation. Higher uncertainty without material transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic blend with water-repellent coating water-resistant coating

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Reebok Men's and Big Men's Xs-5xl, Black is made of, ingredients and materials

This Kinetic jacket uses a synthetic blend fabric (likely polyester or nylon) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water resistance, though newer non-fluorinated alternatives exist. Reebok has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating or a PFAS-free alternative, making the coating chemistry a primary unknown.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast stability

Black synthetic jackets typically use carbon-based or azo-based dyes. Reebok does not publish dye chemistry or azo-dye restriction status. Bleeding or fading on first wash is a minor aesthetic concern, not a direct health hazard, but may indicate lower dye-setting quality.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Polyester production can involve antimony as a catalyst. Reebok does not disclose antimony limits in synthetic garments. Migration risk is low in finished apparel at skin-contact levels, but not zero if the jacket is worn for extended periods or over broken skin.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding during wear and wash

Synthetic blend jackets shed microfibers with every wash and abrasion. The water-repellent coating may accelerate fiber degradation over time as the coating breaks down. This is an environmental hazard more than direct health risk, but contributes to microplastic accumulation in wastewater.

20/ 100
⏳

water-repellent coating degradation and unknown breakdown products

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry creates uncertainty about what compounds are released when the coating wears or is laundered. If the coating is fluorinated PFAS, degradation products may migrate to skin or water; if non-fluorinated, risk is lower but still unverified by Reebok.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based finishing resins are standard in polyester or nylon jackets at this production scale. No recalls or complaints specific to Reebok outerwear formaldehyde content are documented.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok has not issued public commitments phasing out PFAS in apparel coatings, nor has the brand published material safety transparency reports for specific garment lines. The company does not list water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or in available documentation. No recalls or formal safety violations specific to Reebok outerwear water-repellent coating coatings are on record, but this absence reflects low regulatory oversight rather than confirmed safety.

How it compares in its category

Most synthetic jackets at this price point ($50-100 range) use water-repellent coating coatings of unclear chemistry. Competitors like Adidas, Nike, and Columbia similarly do not routinely disclose PFAS status. Brands explicitly using PFAS-free water-repellent coating (Patagonia, some REI Co-op lines) are less common and typically higher cost. The Kinetic jacket sits in the mainstream safety tier, no known hazard triggers, but PFAS disclosure gap is shared across the budget athletic apparel category.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air dry to preserve the water-repellent coating and avoid accelerated breakdown that could increase fiber shedding. Do not dry clean or expose to high heat, as solvents and heat can degrade the coating. Re-apply commercial water-repellent coating treatments after 20-30 washes if water beading diminishes. Since the coating chemistry is unconfirmed, limit direct skin contact with the outer shell if you have sensitivity concerns; wear a base layer underneath.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket, Sizes Xs-5xl, Black?

Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Azo dyes and color fastness

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Trail Craft Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Trail Craft Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.