PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket, Sizes Xs-5xl, Size: 2XL, Black

Reebok · Cycling Rain Jackets

Reebok Men's and Big Men's Kinetic Jacket, Sizes Xs-5xl, Size: 2XL, Black

Bad

Kinetic jacket likely water-repellent coating-coated; coating chemistry not disclosed.

Verdict: SkipSynthetic jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating presents PFAS concern; no major other textile hazards established for Reebok apparel, but durability and care matter.

Reebok provides no PFAS information for this jacket. Water-resistant apparel often uses PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments, but brand silence prevents confirmation. Higher uncertainty without material transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic blend with water-repellent coating water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast stability

Black synthetic jackets typically use carbon-based or azo-based dyes. Reebok does not publish dye chemistry or azo-dye restriction status. Bleeding or fading on first wash is a minor aesthetic concern, not a direct health hazard, but may indicate lower dye-setting quality.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Polyester production can involve antimony as a catalyst. Reebok does not disclose antimony limits in synthetic garments. Migration risk is low in finished apparel at skin-contact levels, but not zero if the jacket is worn for extended periods or over broken skin.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding during wear and wash

Synthetic blend jackets shed microfibers with every wash and abrasion. The water-repellent coating may accelerate fiber degradation over time as the coating breaks down. This is an environmental hazard more than direct health risk, but contributes to microplastic accumulation in wastewater.

20/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and unknown breakdown products

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry creates uncertainty about what compounds are released when the coating wears or is laundered. If the coating is fluorinated PFAS, degradation products may migrate to skin or water; if non-fluorinated, risk is lower but still unverified by Reebok.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based finishing resins are standard in polyester or nylon jackets at this production scale. No recalls or complaints specific to Reebok outerwear formaldehyde content are documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This Kinetic jacket uses a synthetic blend fabric (likely polyester or nylon) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water resistance, though newer non-fluorinated alternatives exist. Reebok has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating or a PFAS-free alternative, making the coating chemistry a primary unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok has not issued public commitments phasing out PFAS in apparel coatings, nor has the brand published material safety transparency reports for specific garment lines. The company does not list water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or in available documentation. No recalls or formal safety violations specific to Reebok outerwear water-repellent coating coatings are on record, but this absence reflects low regulatory oversight rather than confirmed safety.

How it compares in its category

Most synthetic jackets at this price point ($50-100 range) use water-repellent coating coatings of unclear chemistry. Competitors like Adidas, Nike, and Columbia similarly do not routinely disclose PFAS status. Brands explicitly using PFAS-free water-repellent coating (Patagonia, some REI Co-op lines) are less common and typically higher cost. The Kinetic jacket sits in the mainstream safety tier: no known hazard triggers, but PFAS disclosure gap is shared across the budget athletic apparel category.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air dry to preserve the water-repellent coating and avoid accelerated breakdown that could increase fiber shedding. Do not dry clean or expose to high heat, as solvents and heat can degrade the coating. Re-apply commercial water-repellent coating treatments after 20-30 washes if water beading diminishes. Since the coating chemistry is unconfirmed, limit direct skin contact with the outer shell if you have sensitivity concerns; wear a base layer underneath.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.