PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall66/ 100Good
Rubbermaid Lunch Blox Entree

Rubbermaid LunchBlox · Lunch Boxes

Rubbermaid Lunch Blox Entree

Good

Low PFAS concern. Polypropylene food container unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict · BuyPolypropylene food container with no reported BPA, phthalate, or microplastic concerns; low PFAS risk supports routine use with standard precautions.

Rubbermaid LunchBlox Entree is a rigid polypropylene food storage container with no known applied coatings or water-repellent finishes. Polypropylene is a lower-concern material for PFAS, though brand makes no explicit PFAS claim.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

polypropylene plastic container and lid

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Rubbermaid Lunch Blox Entree is made of, ingredients and materials

The Rubbermaid LunchBlox Entree is polypropylene (PP), a thermoplastic with no inherent BPA or phthalates in the base resin. Polypropylene is one of the more chemically stable plastics for food contact and does not readily leach monomers or additives at room temperature or typical microwave use. The container and lid have no reported ceramic, enamel, or decorative glazes that would introduce lead or cadmium risk. Colorants and processing aids present in the plastic are the only additives of concern, but no recalls or safety issues specific to this product line are on record.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Prolonged microwave or exposure to hot liquids (above 70°C) may cause surface degradation and particle shedding over time, though risk is low at typical lunch-storage temperatures (room to warm, not boiling).

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polypropylene formulations used in food containers do not include BPA or BPS. No recalls or contamination reports exist for this product line.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Phthalate plasticizers are not standard in polypropylene; they are more common in PVC and some polyester. No evidence of phthalate use in LunchBlox containers.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Colorant or additive leaching

Pigments and processing aids in polypropylene are regulated by FDA for food contact; no specific contamination or toxin release has been reported for Rubbermaid LunchBlox products.

95/ 100
✅

Coating degradation

LunchBlox containers have no applied coatings (ceramic, enamel, or non-stick); the hazard is not applicable to this product design.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Rubbermaid (owned by Newell Brands) does not make explicit PFAS disclaimers for this product; however, polypropylene containers are not a common source of added PFAS. The brand has faced no major recalls or litigation tied to food-container chemistry. Rubbermaid does not publish third-party certification (BPA-free, FDA-compliance statements) prominently on most LunchBlox packaging, which reflects the standard industry assumption that PP is low-risk rather than explicit assurance.

How it compares in its category

Polypropylene food containers are among the lowest-concern plastics for food storage, ranked safer than polycarbonate (which historically contained BPA) and PVC (which carries phthalate risk). Glass or stainless-steel lunch containers have zero leaching risk but are heavier and more expensive. The LunchBlox is priced competitively and offers durability comparable to other rigid PP lunch sets; no inherent material advantage or disadvantage versus generics exists.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged contact with very hot foods (above 70°C / 160°F) or extended microwave heating, which can degrade PP and increase leaching potential, though risk at normal lunch temperatures is low. Hand-wash or use the top rack of the dishwasher; high heat cycles may accelerate wear. Replace the container if cracks, cloudiness, or visible degradation appear, as damaged plastic is more prone to particle shedding. Store away from direct sunlight to slow UV-induced brittleness and discoloration over years of use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rubbermaid LunchBlox has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.