PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
Rubbermaid LunchBlox Side Cups

Rubbermaid LunchBlox · Lunch Boxes

Rubbermaid LunchBlox Side Cups

Good

Lower concern; basic rigid plastic containers, but brand offers no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict · BuyRigid polypropylene side cups with no established hazard record; lower PFAS concern and standard plastic food-storage profile support routine use with normal care.

LunchBlox side cups are rigid plastic food containers with no published PFAS claims or testing. Rigid plastic food containers have lower inherent PFAS risk than coated or treated items, though no third-party verification exists for this product line.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

plastic (likely polypropylene or polyethylene)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Rubbermaid LunchBlox Side Cups is made of, ingredients and materials

Rubbermaid LunchBlox Side Cups are rigid plastic, almost certainly polypropylene (PP) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE), both common food-contact plastics with relatively stable chemical profiles. Neither material is known to leach BPA or BPS under normal use. PP and HDPE do not off-gas formaldehyde or release phthalates at room temperature, and neither degrades into microplastics through ordinary handling or cool/ambient food storage.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Heating these cups beyond their thermal limits (above 70°C) or repeated thermal cycling can cause warping or micro-cracking. Use of hot foods or dishwasher heat accelerates this risk; hand-wash and cool-food use minimize concern.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth if not dried

Rigid plastic cups with tight-fitting lids can trap moisture if not fully air-dried between uses. This is a hygiene risk rather than a chemical one; proper drying and ventilation prevent it.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polypropylene and HDPE are not formulated with BPA or BPS. No record of these chemicals in Rubbermaid LunchBlox products.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Rigid food-grade PP and HDPE do not typically use phthalate plasticizers. Rubbermaid has no documented phthalate contamination in this product line.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Coating or additive leaching

No coatings, glazes, or non-polymer surface treatments are documented on Rubbermaid LunchBlox side cups. The hazard profile is the base plastic material alone.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Rubbermaid, owned by Newell Brands, does not publicly disclose PFAS content or PFAS-free certification for this product line. The brand has no documented history of recalls or safety issues specific to LunchBlox side cups. Rubbermaid maintains FDA compliance for food-contact plastics but offers minimal transparency on chemical additives beyond regulatory minimum.

How it compares in its category

Rigid PP or HDPE side cups are mainstream in lunch-box systems and pose lower concern than flexible plastic films or coated paper containers, which carry higher microplastic or coating-degradation risk. Competitor products (e.g., Bentgo, Sistema) use similar materials and carry equivalent or less documented safety information. Glass alternatives eliminate plastic leaching entirely but add weight and breakage risk in lunch settings.

If you buy it

Do not heat these cups in a microwave or dishwasher; PP and HDPE can warp or leach additives if exposed to sustained heat above 70°C. Use for cold or room-temperature foods only. Hand-wash with warm soapy water and inspect annually for cracks, cloudiness, or permanent stains, which may indicate polymer degradation; replace if visible damage occurs. Store away from direct sunlight and extreme heat to extend material life.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 68% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rubbermaid LunchBlox has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.