PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
Sistema PDQ 1.1L Ribbon Lunch to Go OBPP

Sistema · Lunch Boxes

Sistema PDQ 1.1L Ribbon Lunch to Go OBPP

Good

Lower concern lunch container, no known PFAS source identified.

Verdict · BuyPolypropylene lunch container with lower PFAS concern, no established hazards on record, and appropriate for cold/room-temperature food storage.

Sistema PDQ is a rigid polypropylene food container with no disclosed coatings or water-repellent treatments. Polypropylene itself carries lower PFAS risk, though brand makes no explicit PFAS commitment.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

polypropylene (PP) plastic container

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Sistema PDQ 1.1L Ribbon Lunch to Go OBPP is made of, ingredients and materials

The Sistema PDQ 1.1L Ribbon container is injection-molded polypropylene (PP), a thermoplastic with a melting point around 130°C. PP does not contain BPA or phthalates by formulation, and is generally considered chemically stable at room temperature and moderate heat. However, PP can leach small amounts of oligomers (incomplete polymer chains) if exposed to prolonged heat, extended contact with certain solvents, or repeated stress cycles. As a lunch container designed for cold or ambient-temperature foods, the material itself presents lower leaching risk compared to containers marketed for hot beverages.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⛏️

Oligomer and monomer leaching

PP containers can release small quantities of incompletely polymerized chains under prolonged heat, mechanical stress, or high-contact scenarios. Risk is minimal at room temperature and for typical lunch-storage use; microwave or dishwasher heat significantly elevates this possibility.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Repeated thermal cycling, scratching, or aging can fragment the PP surface into microparticles. This is a concern if the container is used heavily for years or subjected to abrasive cleaning; normal use and gentle care minimize this risk.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polypropylene is not formulated with BPA or phthalate plasticizers by material chemistry. No recalls or contamination reports exist for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Lid seal and food contact integrity

No established hazards on record for the lid gasket or seal materials. However, worn seals may allow bacterial growth if the container is left in warm environments; replace seals or container if the lid no longer closes tightly.

95/ 100
✅

Coating or surface treatment hazards

No coatings (ceramic, non-stick, or otherwise) are named in the product specification. The container is uncoated molded plastic, so coating-related hazards do not apply.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Sistema (Townshend Group, New Zealand) produces food-storage and kitchenware products with presence in North America and Europe. The company has not published detailed third-party testing results or materials transparency statements on their public website for this product line. No recalls or material hazard warnings specific to the PDQ 1.1L Ribbon model are on record with regulatory agencies (FDA, CPSC, or equivalent). Their silent PFAS stance means no affirmative disclosure of PFAS testing or avoidance; absence of reported contamination does not confirm testing was performed.

How it compares in its category

Polypropylene lunch containers are among the most common reusable food-storage options and carry a lower chemical-leaching profile than rigid polycarbonate (which may contain BPA) or polyvinyl chloride (PVC, which can contain phthalates and unstabilized lead). The PDQ 1.1L sits in the mainstream segment; competitors like Rubbermaid Brilliance (also PP) and Pyrex glass offer similar or comparable safety profiles. Glass alternatives eliminate plastic-leaching concerns but add breakage risk and weight; stainless steel eliminates leaching but may be less airtight.

If you buy it

Use this container for cold or room-temperature foods (salads, sandwiches, leftovers at ambient storage). Do not place it in the dishwasher's heated drying cycle or microwave unless the manufacturer explicitly states microwave safety; repeated heat exposure can stress the polymer and increase oligomer migration. Replace the container if you notice cloudiness, cracks, or persistent staining that suggests degradation. Hand wash with warm (not hot) soapy water and air dry; avoid prolonged contact with acidic foods (citrus, vinegar) in high heat, though this is low-risk at room temperature.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sistema has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.