PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Hilleberg Staika 2 Person Tent

Skandika · Camping Tents & Tarps

Hilleberg Staika 2 Person Tent

Bad

High uncertainty. water-repellent coating tent coatings often contain PFAS; no disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipPolyester tent with undisclosed water-repellent coating presents PFAS uncertainty; no major non-PFAS hazards documented, but brand transparency is poor.

Hilleberg tents typically use water-repellent coating coatings, which frequently contain PFAS, but Skandika provides no public specification. Contact manufacturer directly for coating details.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester fabric with water-repellent coating waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes or azo dye residues

Polyester tent fabric is dyed; if non-compliant azo dyes were used, they can break down to carcinogenic amines under UV exposure or in skin contact. Skandika does not disclose dye sourcing or compliance with REACH or other azo restrictions. Risk is low with established manufacturers but cannot be ruled out without testing.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common catalyst in polyester production; residual antimony can leach if fabric is heated or under acidic conditions. Tent use (outdoor, rain-exposed, no ingestion) presents minimal leaching risk, but long-term storage in hot environments could theoretically increase it. Hilleberg does not test or report residual antimony levels.

70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and microparticle shedding

As water-repellent coating coatings wear, they shed microscopic particles into water and air. If the coating contains PFAS, these particles carry PFAS compounds. Washing also accelerates coating breakdown. This is a documented concern for all coated outdoor textiles, though health impact from outdoor tent use is indirect (mainly via wastewater and ecosystems).

45/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

New polyester tents with freshly applied water-repellent coating may emit slight chemical odor for the first days to weeks, reflecting solvent residues or volatile components in the coating. The smell typically dissipates with airing. Hilleberg does not publish VOC testing data. Risk is minimal for outdoor use and short-term indoor storage.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester textiles do not typically require formaldehyde-based finishing resins. No evidence of formaldehyde-releasing treatments in polyester tent fabrics. Not a documented concern for this product category.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Staika 2 uses polyester fabric as its primary shell material, a synthetic polymer chosen for durability, water resistance, and cost. The fabric is treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to shed rain. water-repellent coating coatings on outdoor textiles have historically relied on PFAS chemicals, though some manufacturers have begun switching to PFAS-free alternatives; Hilleberg/Skandika does not publicly disclose which approach they use for this model. Polyester itself is stable under normal use and does not off-gas formaldehyde or volatile organic compounds the way some treated fabrics do.

The brand's record and disclosure

Skandika/Hilleberg has not published transparency reports on chemical inputs, certifications like Bluesign or OEKO-TEX, or explicit statements ruling out PFAS in their water-repellent coating treatments. This silence is significant in the outdoor gear industry, where competitors like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have begun disclosing PFAS-free options. No recalls related to chemical hazards are publicly recorded for the Staika 2. The brand's lack of proactive communication on this issue makes independent verification of water-repellent coating composition impossible.

How it compares in its category

Most 2-person backpacking tents in the midrange use polyester with water-repellent coating coatings; the Staika 2 is representative, not an outlier. Some premium competitors (Nemo, Big Agnes) now offer certified PFAS-free water-repellent coating versions, while budget brands rarely disclose. Scandinavian manufacturers like Hilleberg are expected to meet Nordic chemical regulations but do not always advertise compliance. Without explicit certification, this tent sits in the large middle category of unknown PFAS exposure.

If you buy it

Wash the tent infrequently and with plain water or mild soap only; harsh detergents can strip the water-repellent coating and potentially mobilize coating particles. Do not machine wash or dry clean. Store dry and unfolded when possible to avoid prolonged contact with moist fabric. Inspect seams and fabric annually for tears or degradation; once the water-repellent coating wears visibly (water beads less, darkens the fabric more), consider replacement if PFAS concerns weigh on you. Do not expose to extreme heat (direct sun storage in hot vehicles).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Skandika has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More camping tents & tarps grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.