PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Skandika dome tent Hammerfest for 6 people camping tent with sewn-in tent base sleeper technology with Black cabins 2 sl

Skandika · Camping Tents & Tarps

Skandika dome tent Hammerfest for 6 people camping tent with sewn-in tent base sleeper technology with Black cabins 2 sl

Bad

Skip until coating details disclosed; tents commonly treated with PFAS-based water-repellent coating.

Verdict: SkipPolyester tent with unknown water-repellent coating poses PFAS risk; non-PFAS concerns manageable with proper maintenance and ventilation during use.

Skandika does not disclose its waterproofing treatment. Dome tents typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS; no public commitment to PFAS-free alternatives found.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester tent fabric with unspecified waterproof coating and sewn base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified waterproof coating on this polyester tent almost certainly contains fluorinated compounds; Skandika's silence on water-repellent coating type and no documentation of PFAS-free alternatives creates reasonable concern for PFAS exposure during use, storage, and eventual disposal.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester fabrics and especially sewn base may be treated with formaldehyde-releasing resins during manufacturing to fix dyes or add wrinkle resistance; no independent testing of this specific product is on record, but this is a known practice in budget polyester textiles.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in black fabric

The black color of the cabin sections may be achieved with azo dyes, which can degrade under UV exposure or perspiration and release aromatic amines; this is not specific to Skandika but a category-wide concern for dark-colored synthetic textiles.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic/particle shedding

Polyester tent coatings deteriorate with age, UV exposure, and flexing during assembly and use, releasing fine particles; no specific recall exists for this model, but shedding of coating particles into camping spaces is well-documented in long-term tent use studies.

45/ 100
💨

Off-gassing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from new tent

New polyester tents often emit odors from residual solvent and coating volatiles during first deployment; this is typically transient and not dangerous but indicates incomplete off-gassing of manufacturing chemicals.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Hammerfest uses polyester fabric as its primary material, a synthetic polymer chosen for durability and water resistance in outdoor textiles. The sewn-in base is also polyester, which resists ground moisture better than natural fibers but requires a waterproof coating (water-repellent coating, or water-repellent coating) to function effectively. Polyester itself is stable when undamaged, but the coating applied to achieve water-repellency is where chemical hazards concentrate, particularly regarding PFAS-based treatments common in budget-priced camping gear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Skandika, a German-based brand, does not publicly disclose the specific chemistry of its waterproof coatings across product lines, which is typical of mid-range tent manufacturers. No independent recalls or safety controversies are established in public records for this model. The brand has not made commitments to PFAS-free production or transparent coating ingredient disclosure, leaving buyers without confirmation of whether fluorinated or non-fluorinated water-repellent coating was used on this tent.

How it compares in its category

Budget dome tents in this price range (under EUR 300 typically) rarely disclose coating details, and many still rely on PFAS-based water-repellent coating for cost-effectiveness. Higher-end brands (e.g., Hilleberg, Big Agnes) increasingly use Teflon-type coating-free or non-fluorinated coatings and publish this information. Skandika sits in the middle tier where coating composition is a blind spot; expect standard practice of the industry rather than premium transparency.

If you buy it

Ensure good ventilation during setup and first use to off-gas any volatile residues from the coating; use in open air rather than enclosed spaces for the first few hours. Avoid heating the tent fabric directly (e.g., with hot water or direct sunlight through glass indoors) as this may degrade the coating and increase leaching of coating components. Reapply water-repellent treatment every 2-3 seasons using products that specify non-PFAS formulations (e.g., silicone-based re-proofing sprays). Inspect the base and fabric seams annually; tears that expose internal coating layers should be patched promptly to prevent microfiber and coating particle shedding.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Skandika has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More camping tents & tarps grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.