PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Solid Striped Women's Veronica One-Piece Swimsuit

Solid & Striped · Swimwear

Solid Striped Women's Veronica One-Piece Swimsuit

Bad

Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating chemistry, swimwear water-repellency often uses PFAS.

Verdict · SkipPFAS in water-repellent coating finish is the primary concern; brand silent on chemistry. Other textile hazards low-risk if cared for properly.

Solid & Striped doesn't publicly disclose the chemical composition of this swimsuit's water-repellent finish. Swimwear durability treatments commonly rely on PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyamide blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Solid Striped Women's Veronica One-Piece is made of, ingredients and materials

This swimsuit is nylon (polyamide) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish, the water-repellent coating is where PFAS risk concentrates. Nylon itself is stable and does not leach appreciably into skin or water during normal wear. The water-repellent coating treatment is applied to maintain water beading and quick-dry properties; most mass-market swimwear uses this finish, and many brands rely on PFAS-based chemistries (notably fluorocarbon compounds) rather than disclosed alternatives like wax or silicone blends.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Solid & Striped has not disclosed water-repellent coating chemistry; nylon swimwear water-repellency commonly relies on PFAS-based fluorocarbon coatings. Dermal absorption during wear is low, but manufacturing and disposal pathways present environmental and bioaccumulation concern.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon textile finishing may include formaldehyde-based resins for shape retention and dye-setting. Residual formaldehyde is uncommon in finished consumer swimwear but possible if quality control is lax; rinsing before first wear mitigates this.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Synthetic nylon swimwear can release microfibers during washing and wear, particularly if the water-repellent coating degrades. Extent depends on fabric weave density and durability; washing in a mesh bag and replacing after 1-2 years reduces cumulative shedding.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific recalls or reports tie Solid & Striped prints or dyes to restricted azo compounds or metal contamination. Nylon takes dyes well and brand positioning suggests standard commercial dyeing; risk is generic to the category, not elevated here.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester blends

This product is described as nylon/polyamide; antimony (a polyester catalyst residue) does not apply. If the actual fiber content differs, review the label.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Solid & Striped has not publicly disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry used in this product or issued a PFAS elimination commitment. The brand markets premium-positioned swim and resort wear but remains silent on chemical inputs in manufacturing, which is typical for mid-tier fashion labels. No major recalls or toxicology controversies are on record for this brand.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream swimwear carries similar water-repellent coating-related uncertainty; premium brands (e.g., Patagonia) often disclose or avoid PFAS explicitly, while fast-fashion competitors rarely do. Solid & Striped sits in the mid-market segment where disclosure is sparse. Opting for non-water-repellent coating nylon or certified PFAS-free alternatives (rare but growing) would reduce this specific risk.

If you buy it

Rinse thoroughly after each use to remove salt, chlorine, and sunscreen residue, this extends life and reduces any dermal contact with residual finish chemicals. Wash in cool water with mild detergent; avoid hot water and bleach, which can degrade the nylon and water-repellent coating prematurely. Air-dry away from direct heat and sunlight to preserve fabric elasticity. Replace when elastic fails or fabric pilling becomes visible (typically 1, 2 years with regular use).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Solid & Striped has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Solid & Striped Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

Solid & Striped

Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton/cotton-blend seersucker plaid
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and colorfast stability

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

adidas Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

Adidas

Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polyester/nylon swimsuit fabric, likely uncoated or standard finish
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.