PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Sorel Revel Rd Women's Waterproof Lace Boot

SOREL · Waterproof Boots

Sorel Revel Rd Women's Waterproof Lace Boot

Bad

Waterproof boot; PFAS coating chemistry undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipLeather upper mitigates some textile hazards, but undisclosed waterproof treatment (likely PFAS-based) and synthetic lining pose chemical exposure risks requiring informed use.

Sorel does not specify water-repellent coating treatment chemistry for this boot. Waterproof leather footwear commonly uses PFAS-based treatments, but no lab data or brand disclosure confirms presence or absence here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather upper, synthetic lining, waterproof treatment unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Sorel Revel Rd Women's Waterproof Lace is made of, ingredients and materials

The Revel Rd combines a leather upper with synthetic lining and an unspecified waterproof treatment. Leather itself is relatively stable chemically, but the synthetic lining and waterproofing chemistry are where hazards concentrate. Waterproof footwear in this price range typically uses fluorochemical or polyurethane coatings; SOREL does not publicly disclose which, making exposure assessment difficult. The synthetic lining may contain plasticizers or flame retardants depending on the polymer type.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic lining or leather finishing

Synthetic linings and leather finishing can employ azo dyes which may release carcinogenic amines under sweat, moisture, or heat. No specific testing of this model is on record; risk depends on dye source and tannery practices.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textile linings and shoe adhesives sometimes contain formaldehyde releasers as preservatives or bonding agents. SOREL does not disclose formaldehyde testing or limits for this boot.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester lining

If the synthetic lining is polyester, it may contain antimony trioxide as a catalyst or flame retardant. Antimony is a heavy metal; leaching risk is low in casual use but increases with moisture and perspiration contact.

70/ 100
🍳

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from waterproof coating and lining

Undisclosed waterproof treatments and synthetic linings typically off-gas VOCs during storage and initial wear, particularly in enclosed spaces. Intensity and duration depend on the specific chemistry and curing process.

20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic lining wear

Synthetic textile linings degrade over time and with laundering or friction; this contributes to microplastic release. Risk increases as the boot ages and the lining breaks down.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

SOREL (owned by Columbia Sportswear) has not disclosed whether waterproofing treatment contains PFAS or published testing data for this model. The brand does not prominently advertise chemical-free or low-chemical lines. Industry-wide, footwear brands have faced pressure on PFAS in water-resistant products, but SOREL has remained silent on its chemistry and sourcing practices. This absence of transparency is notable for a premium-priced boot.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof leather boots typically rely on chemical coatings rather than construction alone; this product is standard in that respect. Competitors like Merrell and Keen have begun disclosing or reducing PFAS use, making SOREL's silence a relative weakness. Non-fluorinated water-resistant alternatives (waxed leather, silicone-based treatments) exist but are less common at this price point. The synthetic lining is typical for boots in this category and poses moderate chemical exposure risk.

If you buy it

Store in a dry, well-ventilated space to avoid off-gassing concentration from the synthetic lining and waterproof coating. Avoid prolonged indoor heat (radiators, dryers) which can accelerate release of volatile compounds from the treatment. Clean with cool water and mild soap rather than heat or solvents that may degrade the waterproof layer. Replace or resole when the lining shows wear, as exposed synthetic material can deteriorate and shed microfibers.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
SOREL has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Boots

Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER

Mephisto

Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER

65GoodPFAS grade
  • leather, textile, rubber sole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives
Hiking shoes Vasque Women's Horizon Mid

Vasque

Hiking shoes Vasque Women's Horizon Mid

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Leather/nubuck upper, synthetic/rubber sole, no coating disclosed
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes (leather/textile coloring)

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.