PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Golf balls Spalding (x36)

Spalding · Golf Balls & Equipment

Golf balls Spalding (x36)

Poor

Spalding golf balls have higher concern due to water-repellent coating with undisclosed chemistry.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls pose minimal acute hazards in normal play, but PFAS coating status unknown and off-gassing during storage warrants caution.

These golf balls have a synthetic rubber or polymer core with a urethane or dimple coating. The coating chemistry is not stated. Spalding has no PFAS statement on record for this product.

The better-graded swap

Eastside Golf Blue Left Hand Swingman Golf Glove

Eastside Golf

Eastside Golf Blue Left Hand Swingman Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic rubber/polymer core with urethane or dimple coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from urethane cover

Urethane and thermoplastic covers can emit low-level VOCs during curing and storage, particularly if stored warm. This is not acutely hazardous in outdoor play but may be noticeable indoors or in poorly ventilated spaces.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from degraded coating

As the dimple coating ages or if damaged, small urethane particles can shed into soil or water, especially on practice ranges. Spalding does not disclose how long the cover remains stable under normal use.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball covers are sometimes treated with water- or soil-repellent fluorochemicals to improve durability and performance. Spalding has not confirmed or denied this practice, making assessment impossible; this hazard is graded separately at 40/100.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented cases of lead or cadmium in golf ball inks or dyes for mainstream brands. Risk is low given the small surface area and non-contact nature of play.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Leaching from core polymer if chewed or damaged

Golf balls are not food products and pose minimal risk if swallowed whole. Synthetic rubber cores are inert; risk of harm is mechanical obstruction, not chemical leaching.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spalding golf balls typically use a synthetic rubber or polymer core (often ionomer resin) wrapped with a urethane or thermoplastic cover, dimpled for aerodynamics. The outer coating is the material in question, urethane and similar polymers can shed microparticles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and early use, especially in warm conditions. The core materials themselves are inert in normal use, but the curing and aging process of the cover can release trace chemicals.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spalding (owned by Evenflo/Grade Inc.) has not publicly disclosed the specific chemical composition of coating materials or fluorochemical use in golf balls. No major product recalls related to chemical safety have been recorded for this product line. The brand offers no transparency around PFAS or other surface treatments, which is typical for the golf ball industry but represents a meaningful gap in consumer information.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls as a category face minimal regulatory scrutiny compared to food-contact items or children's products. Spalding is a mainstream, established brand; its balls are functionally similar to Titleist, TaylorMade, and Callaway equivalents in material hazard profile. The 36-count box suggests recreational or range use rather than premium tournament play, which typically correlates with lower-cost materials and less rigorous quality control.

If you buy it

Store in cool, dry conditions to minimize VOC off-gassing from the urethane cover; avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or heat above 140F, which can accelerate polymer breakdown. Replace balls if the cover shows cracks, peeling, or deep discoloration, as these indicate coating degradation and potential particle shedding. Wash hands after extended contact if sensitive to urethane or synthetic polymers. Do not store in sealed plastic bags in hot vehicles, as this traps off-gassed compounds.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spalding has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.