PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall58/ 100Good
Stanley Comeback Lunchbox

Stanley · Lunch Boxes

Stanley Comeback Lunchbox

Good

Lower concern. Stainless steel lunchbox with no known PFAS sources.

Verdict · BuyStainless steel body eliminates leaching risk; plastic components pose minimal concern if kept away from heat. Lower-concern food storage.

Stanley's classic stainless steel lunchbox uses rigid metal construction with minimal coatings. No PFAS-related features identified, though brand provides no explicit disclosure.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

stainless steel body, plastic latch and lid

Lab data

No public lab test

What Stanley Comeback Lunchbox is made of, ingredients and materials

The Stanley Comeback Lunchbox uses a stainless steel body, which is chemically inert and does not leach metals or compounds into food under normal use. The lid and latch are plastic, likely polypropylene or similar commodity plastic. Stainless steel is preferred for food contact because it forms a passive oxide layer that resists corrosion and migration; plastic components in latches and seals are lower-risk provided they do not contact hot food directly.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Plastic components are not specified as BPA/BPS-free on record. Risk is low if plastic remains below 60°C and does not contact hot or oily foods, but Stanley has not disclosed additive composition.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
🧴

Phthalate plasticizers in latches

Older or budget plastic hinges and seals may contain phthalates. Not confirmed for this model, but no certification or testing data is publicly available.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

If the plastic lid is used in heat or abrasive cycles, surface wear could generate microplastics over years. Not specific to Stanley's formulation, but a long-term concern for any plastic food-contact component.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Stainless steel leaching (nickel, chromium)

Stainless steel food contact is regulated and leaching is negligible under normal use. Acidic foods (vinegar, citrus) can increase migration slightly, but levels remain below food-safety thresholds for 300+ series alloys.

95/ 100
✅

Off-gassing from plastic seals

No documented VOC or odor off-gassing from Stanley latches. Stainless steel does not off-gas; risk depends on plastic resin choice and cure, which are not disclosed.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Stanley has not published transparency reports on BPA, phthalates, or food-contact polymer testing for this product. The brand maintains a long heritage in rugged goods but has not made public commitments to avoid BPA/BPS or phased out other regulated additives in food-contact plastics. No major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this lunchbox model.

How it compares in its category

Stainless steel lunchboxes are among the lowest-concern options in rigid food storage, avoiding BPA/BPS and phthalate leaching that can occur in polycarbonate or vinyl-lined containers. Most competitors in the insulated lunchbox category use plastic bodies or liners, which carry higher potential for polymer additives. Stanley's use of stainless steel as the primary food-contact surface aligns with safer-by-design food storage practice.

If you buy it

Keep the plastic latch and lid away from direct heat; do not use in dishwashers set to high temperature or microwaves if the latch is not removable. Stainless steel does not require special cleaning and resists scratching and corrosion from typical food acids. Inspect plastic seals periodically for cracking or degradation. Rinse after use to prevent odor retention; stainless steel does not absorb flavors but can retain them on the surface if not cleaned promptly.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Stanley has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.