PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
TaylorMade Golf Cold Weather Gloves

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TaylorMade Golf Cold Weather Gloves

Poor

Golf gloves likely water-treated; PFAS status undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic gloves with undisclosed water treatment (likely PFAS); no major hazards reported, but brand silence on chemical inputs warrants cautious use and care.

Cold-weather golf glove with synthetic textile and water-repellent finish, typically containing PFAS. TaylorMade discloses no PFAS information or transparency on materials.

The better-graded swap

Cobra Snake Blue Illustration Golf Balls

Cobra

Cobra Snake Blue Illustration Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic textile with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

If the base textile is polyester (common in synthetic golf gloves), polyester production may involve antimony trioxide catalysts. Levels in finished fabric are generally low and not considered a skin hazard from wearing, but it is a processing residue. TaylorMade does not disclose polyester sourcing or catalyst removal.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

As water-repellent coating wears off through use and washing, microscopic polymer and chemical fragments may shed. This is not a documented hazard specific to TaylorMade but is inherent to treated synthetic textiles and increases with use cycles.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based dyes or cross-linking agents are standard in modern synthetic golf glove production, though some budget manufacturers use them. TaylorMade's tier and brand position suggest avoidance of these older processes, but no testing data is public.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes (color fastness)

High-end synthetic sportswear typically avoids banned azo dyes, and TaylorMade is established enough to likely use dye systems with lower concern for this hazard. No recalls or reports of azo dye presence exist for this brand's gloves.

95/ 100

Skin irritation from dyes or finish residues

No allergic reactions or dermatological complaints are on record for TaylorMade Cold Weather Gloves. The brand's market presence and lack of complaints suggest dyes and finishes meet basic safety standards, though sensitive skin users may want to test fit before extended wear.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

TaylorMade Cold Weather Gloves are synthetic textiles (typically polyester blends or neoprene) treated with water-repellent finishes to shed moisture and maintain grip in wet conditions. These water-repellent treatments are almost always fluorochemical-based (PFAS family), which are persistent in the environment and human body. The synthetic base itself is stable, but the applied coating is the main chemical concern. Washing and wear gradually degrade the coating, releasing small amounts of treatment chemicals.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade has made no public commitment to PFAS elimination or transparency about chemical inputs in textiles. The brand does not list ingredient sourcing or third-party testing results for glove treatments on product pages or sustainability reports. This silence is industry-typical for golf apparel but notable given growing consumer awareness. No major recalls or chemical safety controversies are on record for TaylorMade clothing.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a niche segment with limited competitive transparency on chemical treatment. Most cold-weather golf gloves (Callaway, Ping, FootJoy brands) use similar synthetic-plus-treatment recipes without disclosure. Wool or wool-blend alternatives exist but are rarer and less water-resistant. TaylorMade's positioning and price point are standard; they offer no apparent chemical or sustainability advantage over peers.

If you buy it

Hand-wash in cool water rather than machine wash to preserve the water-repellent coating and minimize leaching. Avoid prolonged heat exposure (do not machine dry or leave in direct sun for extended periods). Replace gloves when the water-repellent coating visibly breaks down (water no longer beads on fabric). Store dry in a cool place to extend usable life and reduce chemical degradation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.