PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
TAYLORMADE MEN RAIN CONTROL 1 PAIR GLOVES Black/Gray / Medium

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TAYLORMADE MEN RAIN CONTROL 1 PAIR GLOVES Black/Gray / Medium

Poor

Golf glove likely treated for water resistance; PFAS undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic leather golf gloves carry undisclosed water-repellent treatment risk; no major contamination records, but care protocols and replacement timing matter.

Rain-focused golf glove with synthetic leather and water-repellent treatment designed for wet-weather grip. TaylorMade does not disclose chemical composition or PFAS avoidance.

The better-graded swap

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

Volvik

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather / polyurethane with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf gloves are typically treated with water-repellent coating coatings; TaylorMade does not disclose whether this is PFAS-based or PFAS-free. Direct skin contact during wear is the primary exposure route. Graded separately as PFAS (20/100).

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Polyurethane degradation and particle shedding

Synthetic polyurethane gloves degrade with sweat exposure and flexing, releasing microparticles. This is not a chemical toxicity hazard but a mechanical wear issue; replacement every 12-18 months limits chronic exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic leather

No specific azo dye contamination reported in TaylorMade golf gloves. Polyurethane gloves typically use lower-risk colorants than leather, but ingredient disclosure is absent. Risk is theoretical rather than established.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Black and gray polyurethane gloves could contain metallic pigments, but no contamination incidents or test results for TaylorMade products are on record. Standard industry practice in sports gloves does not typically involve high-risk metals.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-releasing resins are more common in textile finishes than in polyurethane glove coatings, and no specific testing or reports exist for TaylorMade Rain Control gloves.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

TaylorMade Rain Control gloves use synthetic polyurethane leather (not animal leather) with an applied water-repellent coating, likely a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment. Polyurethane itself is generally stable during normal wear, but the surface treatment is the primary concern since water-resistance coatings historically relied on PFAS chemistry, though modern formulations increasingly use non-fluorinated alternatives. The black/gray coloring introduces potential for azo dyes or heavy metal pigments in the synthetic base, though polyurethane gloves typically use lower-risk dyes than natural leather.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of glove treatments or certify compliance with restricted substance lists (RSL) such as BLUESIGN or GOTS. The brand has made no public statements about PFAS avoidance or transition to PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternatives in apparel. This silence is consistent with most golf equipment manufacturers, which lag behind outdoor and athletic wear brands in chemical transparency. No recalls or contamination incidents specific to TaylorMade gloves are on record.

How it compares in its category

Rain-control golf gloves inherently carry higher chemical-treatment risk than uncoated synthetic gloves because water resistance requires added coatings. Compared to premium brands like Callaway or Titleist, TaylorMade offers mid-market pricing with similar disclosure gaps. Alternatives include untreated synthetic gloves or leather gloves treated with beeswax or silicone water-repellent coating, though these trade water performance for reduced chemical risk. No major competitor in this category publicly guarantees PFAS-free treatment.

If you buy it

Wash gloves by hand in cool water with mild soap after each use to remove sweat, which accelerates coating breakdown and can increase skin contact with underlying chemicals. Air dry flat or on a glove stretcher; do not machine wash, tumble dry, or expose to direct heat, which degrades polyurethane. Replace gloves every 12-18 months or when the grip surface deteriorates visibly, as degraded coatings may release particles. Store in a breathable bag to prevent moisture entrapment, which promotes mold and accelerates material breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.