TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment
TaylorMade Men's 2025 Tour Preferred Motion Golf Glove
Water-treated golf glove; no PFAS information from brand.
Golf gloves typically receive water-repellent coating or water-resistant treatments that might contain PFAS. TaylorMade shares no public information on treatment chemistry or PFAS status.
The better-graded swap
Top Flite
Top Flite Women's Aura Golf Glove
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather and synthetic leather with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Golf gloves are treated with water-repellent coating finishes to maintain grip in wet conditions. TaylorMade does not disclose the chemistry; industry standard is PFAS-based water-repellent coating, though some manufacturers now use fluorine-free alternatives. Direct skin contact is continuous during wear, and sweat can slightly mobilize coating residues.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating degradation and particle shedding with age
As the glove ages and the water-resistant coating wears, small particles or degraded finish fragments may be inhaled or ingested via hand-to-mouth contact. This is a use-life hazard rather than an acute one; replacement when grip wears noticeably mitigates exposure.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
No recalls or test reports specific to TaylorMade Tour Preferred gloves. Synthetic overlays (polyester/PU) can carry trace metals (e.g., cadmium in pigments) if dyes are not regulated; TaylorMade has not published dye certification for this product.
Source, FDA ↗Azo dyes in leather or synthetic components
Genuine cabretta leather and synthetic fabrics used in golf gloves may contain azo dyes, which can release carcinogenic amines under degradation or prolonged sweat exposure. No specific testing data available for this product; risk is low but unquantified.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Leather tanning typically uses chromium salts (low formaldehyde risk) rather than formaldehyde-based methods, but water-resistant resin coatings may contain trace formaldehyde. No certification or test report available for this glove.
Source, ATSDR ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
TaylorMade's 2025 Tour Preferred Motion glove combines genuine leather (typically cabretta or sheepskin in premium golf gloves) with synthetic overlays for durability and grip. The water-resistant treatment applied to the leather and synthetics is where chemical concern concentrates; golf glove manufacturers routinely use water-repellent finishes, and the specific chemistry is rarely disclosed to consumers. Leather itself is stable and non-toxic when untreated, but the coating process introduces potential exposure during manufacture and minor leaching during use, especially if the glove becomes wet or is cleaned aggressively.
The brand's record and disclosure
TaylorMade (Callaway Golf subsidiary) has no public record of PFAS or chemical-coating transparency statements for apparel or gloves. The brand does not publish materials certifications (e.g., REACH, Bluesign, or GOTS) for golf gloves in available documentation. No major recalls or health controversies linked to Tour Preferred gloves have been reported. This silence is typical for the golf equipment category, where chemical disclosure lags behind footwear and textiles brands.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves occupy a narrow category with few transparent competitors. Premium alternatives like Callaway, Ping, and Titleist typically apply similar water-resistant treatments without disclosure. Budget gloves use cheaper synthetics with heavier chemical coatings; premium leather gloves like TaylorMade tend to use less aggressive finishes but still do not disclose composition. None of the major golf glove brands publish third-party testing or PFAS commitments, making this product representative of standard industry practice rather than an outlier.
If you buy it
Wash the glove with mild soap and cool water after use, especially on humid or rainy days, to minimize coating degradation and any potential leaching during extended contact with sweat. Avoid machine washing and do not expose to heat (dishwasher, dryer, direct sunlight for extended periods), which can break down the water-resistant finish prematurely and concentrate residual chemicals. Replace the glove when the grip surface wears smooth or the leather cracks, typically every 6-12 months depending on frequency of play. Store dry in a breathable pouch to prevent mold and preserve coating integrity.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- TaylorMade has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment
Vice Golf
Vice Drip Golf Balls
synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover
PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Chromium in leather tanning residue
Limited concern
Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components
Limited concern
Heavy metals
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather
Limited concern
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.