PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
TaylorMade Men's TP Golf Glove

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TaylorMade Men's TP Golf Glove

Poor

Water-resistant glove; PFAS status unclear from brand.

Verdict · SkipLeather/microfiber golf glove with unclear water-resistant coating PFAS status; no major toxicity flags on record, but durability and coating transparency warrant cautious use.

Treated leather or synthetics provide water resistance on this glove, but TaylorMade makes no PFAS disclosure. water-repellent coating coatings often contain PFAS, though unconfirmed here.

The better-graded swap

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather, synthetic, microfiber with water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

TaylorMade does not disclose whether the water-resistant finish uses PFAS-based or fluorine-free chemistry. Given the 40/100 PFAS safety grade assigned to this product, a PFAS-containing coating is plausible but unconfirmed; hand contact is the primary exposure route.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Synthetic microfiber shedding

Microfiber backings can shed microfibers under friction and abrasion, especially as the glove ages. The amount is minimal but accumulates with repeated use; no published data exists on microfiber content or shedding rates for this specific model.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle release

Water-resistant coatings degrade with sweat exposure, UV, and repeated washing. As the coating flakes or wears, users may inhale or ingest microscopic particles; the composition of degradation products is unknown due to lack of coating disclosure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Leather tanning chemical residues

Sheepskin and cabretta leather used in golf gloves are typically chrome-tanned or vegetable-tanned by major suppliers; no specific safety recalls or heavy metal contamination reports exist for TaylorMade TP gloves. Standard leather safety is adequate for hand-contact applications.

95/ 100

Fragrance or chemical sensitivizers in treatment

No reports of contact dermatitis or allergic reactions specific to TP gloves exist in available sources. However, untreated leather or synthetic textiles treated with antimicrobial/odor-control chemicals can trigger reactions; TaylorMade does not list treatment additives.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

TaylorMade TP gloves combine genuine leather (typically sheepskin or cabretta for the palm) with synthetic microfiber backing and a water-resistant coating applied to the outer surface. The water-resistance treatment is the primary chemical concern; TaylorMade does not publicly disclose whether this coating contains PFAS or alternative hydrophobic agents. Leather itself carries minimal inherent toxicity risk when properly tanned, though the tanning process chemicals used vary by supplier.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade has not published material safety data, chemical composition disclosures, or PFAS policies for sporting goods products. The brand maintains no visible third-party certifications (Leather Working Group, bluesign, etc.) for the TP glove line. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to this glove model are on record. This silence on water-resistant coating chemistry is typical of golf equipment manufacturers but leaves end-users without verification of whether lower-concern alternatives are used.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a niche category with minimal regulatory oversight; most competitors (Callaway, Ping, FootJoy) similarly lack public PFAS or chemical disclosure. Leather/microfiber hybrids like the TP are standard construction; all-synthetic alternatives exist but are less common at the premium tier. The water-resistant finish is standard across performance gloves and uniformly undisclosed across the category, making this product neither worse nor exceptionally better than peers.

If you buy it

Wash the glove by hand in cool water with mild soap after use; avoid hot water, bleach, or machine washing, which can degrade both the leather and coating. Replace the glove every 12-18 months or when the palm shows visible wear, as degraded coating may shed microfibers or coating particles into your hands. Store in a dry location away from direct heat or UV to extend the water-resistant treatment. If you have known sensitivities to fragrance or chemical treatments, consider requesting a sample or contacting TaylorMade for coating details.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.