PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall36/ 100Poor
TaylorMade RBZ Tech Golf Glove

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TaylorMade RBZ Tech Golf Glove

Poor

Golf glove water treatment unknown; TaylorMade has no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict · SkipLeather/synthetic golf glove with unknown PFAS water treatment; no major non-PFAS hazards documented, but moisture-wicking chemistry and brand silence warrant cautious use.

Standard water-repellent coating coatings used on golf gloves often contain PFAS, but TaylorMade won't reveal treatment chemistry or PFAS content for this product.

The better-graded swap

On Course 36 Piece Practice Golf Balls

On Course 36 Piece Practice Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather/synthetic with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Moisture-wicking golf gloves commonly use PFAS or other fluorochemical finishes; TaylorMade's specific formulation is undisclosed, making it impossible to confirm safety. Direct skin contact during wear is low-risk for leaching, but glove manufacturing wastewater poses environmental concern.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic fiber degradation under heat/friction

Polyester or nylon overlays on this glove are chemically stable during normal hand-contact use and do not release microplastics or volatiles under typical conditions. Risk is minimal unless glove is exposed to intense heat (>80°C), which is not a typical use scenario.

95/ 100

Leather tanning residues (chrome or vegetable)

Standard chrome tanning has lower concern for skin contact when properly processed; no contamination recalls exist for TaylorMade gloves. Chromium VI (hexavalent) risk is minimal in finished leather goods if tanning was compliant with EU/US standards.

95/ 100

Azo dyes or colorants in synthetic components

No specific azo dye concerns are documented for RBZ gloves. Modern golf glove dyes are generally restricted under apparel safety standards, though TaylorMade does not independently certify compliance.

95/ 100

Fragrance or finish adhesive off-gassing

Golf gloves do not typically contain added fragrance. Adhesives used to bond leather/synthetic layers are minimal and cure during manufacturing; no VOC off-gassing reports exist for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The RBZ Tech combines leather (likely goat or sheep) with synthetic moisture-wicking fibers, treated with water-repellent finishes to enhance grip in humid conditions. Moisture-wicking treatments on textiles often rely on fluorochemical coatings (PFAS) or silicone-based polymers; TaylorMade has not disclosed which approach this glove uses. The leather component itself carries minimal toxicity risk if chrome-tanned (industry standard), though vegetable-tanned alternatives exist. Synthetic overlays may include polyester, nylon, or elastane, all chemically stable under normal hand-contact conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade is a major golf equipment manufacturer with no public PFAS commitment or third-party certifications (e.g., bluesign, OEKO-TEX) listed for apparel lines. The company does not disclose chemical composition of moisture-wicking treatments on its glove product pages, which is standard industry opaqueness for sports brands. No recalls or safety controversies specific to RBZ gloves are on record. This silence on water-repellent chemistry is the core concern, as it prevents confirmation of PFAS avoidance.

How it compares in its category

Most golf gloves use leather/synthetic blends with some form of water-resistant finish; few brands disclose the chemistry. Certified alternatives (e.g., OEKO-TEX Standard 100 golf gloves from smaller makers) exist but are less widely available and often cost more. Premium brands like Callaway and Ping offer similar undisclosed treatments. The RBZ is competitively positioned on durability and grip, not on chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Hand-wash in cool water with mild soap to preserve the moisture-wicking coating and leather; avoid machine washing, which degrades both. Dry flat away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent synthetic fibers from warping. Replace when the grip surface becomes shiny or slippery, typically after 20-40 rounds of golf depending on frequency and climate. Avoid prolonged exposure to chlorine (pools) and harsh detergents, which can strip water-repellent treatments.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.