PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
TaylorMade Tour Preferred Golf Glove

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TaylorMade Tour Preferred Golf Glove

Poor

Water-resistant glove; PFAS risk uncertain due to brand silence.

Verdict · SkipLeather palm gloves carry minimal established chemical hazards; PFAS in water-resistant coating is the primary concern but unconfirmed by TaylorMade.

Treated leather and synthetic materials give this glove water resistance, but TaylorMade won't disclose PFAS information, leaving coating details unclear.

The better-graded swap

Mizuno Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Mizuno

Mizuno Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic back, water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant finishes on textiles and leather commonly use PFAS-based compounds; TaylorMade has not disclosed the specific chemistry of this glove's coating. Skin contact risk from a glove is low, but inhalation during manufacturing and eventual disposal are the primary concern pathways.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Allergens from leather or dyes

Individuals with known leather or metal allergies may react to the palm or dyes used in processing. This is a personal sensitivity issue rather than a product defect and is not specific to TaylorMade's manufacturing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Leather production typically involves chromium or other heavy metal salts in tanning. No specific testing or recall data exists for TaylorMade golf gloves, and direct skin contact with treated leather under normal wear is a low-risk pathway for systemic absorption.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Synthetic back material degradation

The polyester or nylon back is stable under normal use and does not leach chemicals into skin at room temperature. Microfiber shedding is theoretically possible but not established as a concern for performance gloves worn intermittently.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Textile processing can introduce formaldehyde resins or azo dyes; no testing or complaints are on record for this product. The synthetic back is not water-resistant and undergoes less intensive finishing than the palm, reducing risk.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Tour Preferred glove combines genuine leather on the palm with synthetic (likely polyester or nylon) on the back, finished with a water-resistant coating. Leather itself is a processed animal material with low inherent toxicity risk compared to plastics, but the water-resistant treatment applied to achieve performance is the key variable. The synthetic back material is stable under normal use conditions and does not involve heating, so typical plastic leaching concerns are minimal.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade has not published detailed chemical disclosure or PFAS-free certifications for this product line. The brand has no recorded recalls or public controversies specific to chemical safety in golf gloves. This silence on water-resistant coating chemistry is typical across the golf equipment industry and does not indicate a known problem, but it does mean PFAS presence cannot be ruled out.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are lower-risk than many consumer products because they do not contact food, are not heated, and are worn on the exterior only. Compared to other leather-palm gloves in the market, TaylorMade's mainstream positioning and quality reputation suggest reasonable manufacturing standards, though no independent testing data is publicly available. Water-resistant golf gloves as a category all carry the same unconfirmed PFAS coating risk.

If you buy it

Wash the glove by hand in lukewarm water after use to remove sweat and debris; avoid machine washing and tumble drying, which can degrade the water-resistant finish and leather. Store in a dry place away from direct heat. Replace when the palm shows visible wear or grip is compromised, typically after 2-3 seasons of regular play. Do not expose to hot water, solvents, or prolonged sunlight, as these can damage both the coating and leather.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.