PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's All Terrain Gore-Tex Waterproof Jacket

The North Face · Rain Jackets

The North Face Men's All Terrain Gore-Tex Waterproof Jacket

Bad

High PFAS risk due to Gore-Tex, The North Face has not disclosed PFAS phaseout plans.

Verdict: SkipGore-Tex PFAS content is established risk; no other major hazards documented. Usable with awareness of Teflon-family coating exposure and proper care.

Gore-Tex waterproof membranes are historically Teflon-type coating-based Teflon-family coating, a known source of PFAS exposure. The North Face does not publicly claim PFAS-free status for this jacket.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex membrane (Teflon-type coating-based Teflon-family coating) with nylon shell

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating membrane off-gassing / inhalation risk

Cured Teflon-type coating is stable at normal wearing temperatures, but heat (dryer, direct sun, steam) can release volatile fluorinated compounds. Acute exposure risk is low in typical use; chronic low-level exposure from worn jackets has not been quantified in peer-reviewed studies specific to consumers.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from membrane and nylon

Degradation of Gore-Tex laminates and nylon shells releases microplastics during washing and wear, especially if seams delaminate or the membrane cracks. Microfiber shed from Gore-Tex and nylon enters wastewater; ecological impact is established, though human health risk from ingestion remains under investigation.

20/ 100
⛏️

Seam tape adhesive leachables

Seam tapes are typically polyurethane-based adhesives; if exposed (tape peeling), trace polyols or isocyanate residues may leach in wet conditions. This is a product durability issue rather than a design safety flaw, and documented cases in rain jackets are rare.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

The North Face nylon textiles are typically dyed with azo dyes and disperse dyes; no specific recalls or test data indicating heavy metal contamination (e.g., lead, chromium) in this product line are on public record. Standard industry testing under bluesign certification covers restricted substance lists.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern Gore-Tex production does not routinely use formaldehyde-based resins for water-repellency; these are replaced by PFAS alternatives. No specific formaldehyde warnings have been issued for this product or brand.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses Gore-Tex, a microporous expanded Teflon-type coating (polytetrafluoroethylene) membrane laminated to a nylon shell. Teflon-type coating itself is chemically inert once cured, but Gore-Tex manufacture historically requires PFAS-based surfactants and processing aids, creating PFAS residue in the finished fabric. The nylon shell is dyed and may contain residual processing chemicals. Gore-Tex's waterproofing durability depends on maintaining the membrane integrity; degradation can increase microfiber shedding.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not published PFAS reduction commitments or phaseout timelines despite Gore-Tex's known PFAS content. The brand holds bluesign certification for some product lines, which restricts certain hazardous chemicals but does not specifically address PFAS in technical membranes. No public recalls or safety advisories specific to this jacket model are on record. The brand's silence on PFAS in waterproof gear is typical industry-wide but limits transparency.

How it compares in its category

Gore-Tex jackets occupy the premium performance segment and are among the most PFAS-intensive rain jackets due to membrane technology. Polyurethane-based waterproof alternatives (e.g., from Patagonia, Arc'teryx) generally reduce but do not eliminate PFAS, as water-repellent coating finishes often use fluorinated compounds. Budget nylon jackets with silicone or wax coatings avoid Teflon-type coating but sacrifice breathability and longevity. This North Face model represents the established industry standard for performance; PFAS content is a structural feature, not a manufacturing flaw.

If you buy it

Avoid heating the jacket in a dryer; heat accelerates Teflon-type coating off-gassing (though laboratory evidence of harm from wearing cured Gore-Tex is lacking). Wash separately and infrequently to reduce microfiber release; use cool water and mild detergent without bleach, which can degrade the membrane. Inspect seam tape and membrane for peeling or delamination annually; replace if major damage occurs. Store dry and away from direct heat to extend membrane life and minimize degradation exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.