PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Antora Rain Hoodie

The North Face · Rain Jackets

The North Face Men's Antora Rain Hoodie

Bad

water-repellent coating-coated rain jacket with no public PFAS disclosure, seek brand clarification.

Verdict: SkipNylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish poses moderate PFAS concern due to no public disclosure; other textile hazards appear low-risk for typical use.

The Antora Rain Hoodie uses a water-repellent coating finish typical of technical rain apparel, historically associated with fluorochemical treatments. The North Face has not disclosed PFAS content or made PFAS-free claims.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon rain jackets commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings; no public disclosure from The North Face on whether this model uses legacy PFAS, newer C6, or PFAS-free alternatives. Brand silence on water-repellent coating supplier elevates concern from hypothetical to actionable consumer question.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

VOC or off-gassing from synthetic fibers and adhesives

New nylon jackets may emit low levels of volatile compounds during initial use, particularly if seams are taped with synthetic adhesives. Airing out the garment before first wear and washing reduces odor; no health incidents have been reported for this specific product.

70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and microparticle release

As water-repellent coating finish wears, it can shed fine particles into wash water. The risk is environmental (PFAS leaching into waterways) rather than dermal, but repeated re-application increases cumulative exposure to whatever chemistry is used.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon ripstop itself does not typically require formaldehyde-releasing finishes (those are common in cotton). No established reports of formaldehyde hazards specific to The North Face Antora or similar nylon rain jackets.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes or antimony in polyester

This product uses nylon (not polyester), so antimony is not a concern. Azo dyes in nylon ripstop are possible but not documented as a reported issue for this brand or category.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Antora uses nylon ripstop fabric, a lightweight woven synthetic chosen for tear and abrasion resistance in rain jackets. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer layer is the primary chemical concern: most commercial water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds like C8 (PFOA), though some brands have shifted to PFAS-free alternatives. The North Face has not publicly disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry is used in this specific model, making independent verification impossible without direct contact with the brand.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face (owned by VF Corporation) has not made industry-leading commitments on PFAS elimination comparable to some outdoor competitors (e.g., Patagonia's PFOA phase-out statements). The brand does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or water-repellent coating supplier information for consumer review. No major product recalls or documented health incidents specific to this hoodie have been reported, but the lack of transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry is a gap in consumer trust.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream rain jackets (The North Face, Columbia, Salomon) use nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating finishes and share the same PFAS disclosure limitation. Brands explicitly marketing PFAS-free water-repellent coating (e.g., Patagonia with C6 or fluorine-free systems, some Fjallraven models) are rarer and typically cost more. The Antora is mid-tier in both price and chemical transparency; it is not an outlier for poor practice within its segment, but not a leader in disclosure either.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket in cool water with mild detergent before first wear to reduce any loose finish residues. Avoid machine drying or high heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release fumes from degrading synthetic fibers. Re-apply water-repellent coating treatment (via commercial spray or wash-in products) every 1-2 years as water repellency decreases with wear. Consider contacting The North Face directly to ask which water-repellent coating chemistry is used in your specific model year if PFAS exposure is a personal health priority.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.