PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Apex Bionic 3 Softshell Jacket

The North Face · Rain Jackets

The North Face Men's Apex Bionic 3 Softshell Jacket

Bad

Moderate PFAS risk due to water-repellent coating treatment, The North Face provides no disclosure.

Verdict: SkipPolyester softshell with water-repellent coating carries moderate PFAS risk; no other major textile hazards on record. Brand transparency is weak but product itself poses no confirmed formaldehyde, azo dye, or antimony issues.

The Apex Bionic 3 uses a water-repellent coating typical of performance softshells, historically reliant on PFOA and PFAS-based chemistry. The North Face does not publicly disclose whether this jacket uses PFAS-free water-repellent coating.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester softshell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-repellent finishes on softshell jackets commonly use perfluorinated compounds. The North Face provides no disclosure of water-repellent coating chemistry for the Apex Bionic 3, making PFAS presence probable but unconfirmed.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from polyester

Polyester textiles shed microfibers during washing and wear. While not a direct toxicology hazard to the wearer, accumulated microfibers in wastewater and aquatic ecosystems are an environmental concern, particularly if the water-repellent coating fragments.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and leaching

water-repellent coating coatings break down over time and with repeated washing. As the topcoat deteriorates, underlying polyester remains safe, but any residual fluorochemicals may shed into water. Longevity and replacement intervals directly affect total PFAS exposure risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of formaldehyde-based finishes in The North Face softshells. Polyester and water-repellent coating coatings do not typically require formaldehyde crosslinkers, though some textile dyes or resins may contain trace amounts; none reported for this model.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes or antimony in polyester

The North Face sources polyester through established suppliers; no recalls or reports of restricted azo dyes or antimony contamination in Apex Bionic jackets. The brand is not known for uncontrolled dyeing practices.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Apex Bionic 3 is constructed from polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) topcoat. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on perfluorinated chemicals (PFAS) to achieve water beading; while some brands have moved to non-fluorinated alternatives, The North Face has not publicly disclosed which chemistry is used in this jacket. Polyester itself is stable and does not leach plasticizers or BPA under normal wear conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not published a PFAS elimination roadmap or fluorochemical disclosure policy comparable to competitors like Patagonia or Arc'teryx. The company has faced environmental scrutiny over supply-chain practices but maintains no public commitment to phasing out PFAS in apparel. Without direct communication to consumers about water-repellent coating chemistry, the PFAS content of this specific jacket remains unknown.

How it compares in its category

Softshell rain jackets routinely use water-repellent coating coatings; most major brands (Columbia, Salomon, REI Co-op) offer models with either PFAS-based or emerging non-fluorinated alternatives without always clarifying which. The North Face's silence on this choice places it at the middle-to-lower end of category transparency. Brands that explicitly certify PFAS-free water-repellent coating (via bluesign or Oeko-Tex STANDARD 100) offer clearer assurance.

If you buy it

Wash separately on gentle cycles to minimize shedding of microfibers and any coating particles. Avoid high heat (no dryer; air dry only) to preserve the water-repellent coating finish and prevent degradation that could expose base polyester. Reapply water-repellent coating treatments periodically with commercial products or wash-in treatments; many aftermarket water-repellent coating boosters are also PFAS-based, so research alternatives labeled PFAS-free if that is a priority. Replace if seams fail or coating visibly peels, as compromised waterproofing may lead to interior moisture and mold growth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.