PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Quest Mono Jacket

The North Face · Rain Jackets

The North Face Men's Quest Mono Jacket

Bad

Skip until The North Face discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or switches to PFAS-free treatments.

Verdict: SkipNylon rain jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry poses PFAS uncertainty; no other established hazards reported. Buy only if you accept PFAS risk or contact brand for water-repellent coating confirmation.

The Quest Mono Jacket uses a standard water-repellent coating finish typical of outdoor apparel, but The North Face does not publicly disclose whether it contains PFAS-based or non-PFAS repellents. The brand has not made PFAS-free claims.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

water-repellent coating composition (fluorochemical unknown)

The product uses an undisclosed water-repellent coating finish typical of nylon rain jackets. Long-chain PFAS (PFOS, PFOA) or their replacements may be present; dermal absorption during wear is minimal, but washing and eventual disposal could release these compounds to wastewater. No alternative fluorine-free water-repellent coating has been confirmed for this model.

70/ 100
🫧

Nylon fiber shedding and microplastic release

Synthetic nylon jackets shed microfibers during normal washing and wear; this is a category-wide concern, not specific to The North Face. Wearing and laundering generates nanoscale to micrometer-scale fragments that enter wastewater. No data exists on North Face garment shedding rates compared to competitors.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon does not require formaldehyde-based dyes or wrinkle-resist finishes. No reports of formaldehyde contamination in this jacket or similar North Face nylon shells have been documented in public safety databases.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The Quest Mono's solid color construction (typically black, grey, navy) suggests standard disperse or acid dyes on polyamide, which are regulated under EU and REACH standards. The North Face does not use suppliers known for azo dye violations. No heavy metal contamination has been reported for this product line.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester trim or hardware

This jacket is nylon-based, not polyester. Metal hardware (zippers, snaps) is not typically a source of antimony leaching under normal wear. No contamination reports exist for North Face hardware in this category.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Quest Mono uses a nylon shell, typically 100% polyamide, treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to shed water without pooling. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on long-chain PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS) or similar fluorochemicals; newer alternatives exist but manufacturers rarely disclose which. Nylon itself is stable and does not leach hazardous monomers under normal wear, making the water-repellent coating treatment the primary chemical exposure vector for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not published a transparent water-repellent coating chemistry statement for consumer products, nor have they committed publicly to PFAS-free water repellency across their apparel line. The brand has faced general corporate pressure on PFAS use but remains non-committal on this specific jacket. No recalls or toxicity incidents are on record for this model, and the jacket carries no third-party eco-certifications that would guarantee water-repellent coating safety.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream rain jackets from major brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia, Columbia) likewise use conventional water-repellent coating but increasingly label it or commit to PFAS alternatives. Patagonia has disclosed a shift to PFC-free water-repellent coating on some lines; The North Face has not matched this transparency. Budget and mid-tier competitors often use untreated nylon or silicone-based coatings, which avoid PFAS but sacrifice durability and water-shedding performance.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool to warm water to minimize shedding of water-repellent coating particles; avoid chlorine bleach and fabric softeners, which degrade water-repellent coating. Do not dry-clean or tumble-dry on high heat, as excess heat can potentially volatilize trace fluorochemicals if present. Expect water-repellent coating performance to decline after 30-50 washes; professional reapplication is available but will reintroduce the same unknown water-repellent coating chemistry. If PFAS exposure is a concern, contact The North Face customer service to request water-repellent coating material specification before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.