PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Summit Superior FUTURELIGHT Jacket

The North Face · Cycling Rain Jackets

The North Face Men's Summit Superior FUTURELIGHT Jacket

Bad

Premium waterproof jacket. PFAS status undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipHigh-performance waterproof jacket with undisclosed PFAS risk; known brand, solid non-PFAS material safety, but requires careful laundering to minimize exposure.

FUTURELIGHT is a proprietary breathable membrane coating. The North Face does not publicly disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating treatment chemistry; verify directly with brand before purchase if PFAS avoidance is critical.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with FUTURELIGHT membrane coating

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What The North Face Men's Summit Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

The Summit Superior FUTURELIGHT uses nylon and polyester base fabrics bonded to The North Face's proprietary FUTURELIGHT membrane coating. This membrane delivers waterproofing and breathability without traditional fluorinated PFAS compounds, yet the brand has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of the membrane itself. Nylon and polyester fibers themselves pose minimal acute hazards, but the coating chemistry and any dyes or finishes applied during manufacture are the primary concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textile dyeing and finishing commonly employ formaldehyde-releasing resins for color fixation and wrinkle resistance. No independent testing of this specific jacket is on record; North Face does not certify formaldehyde limits. New garments may off-gas low levels; washing before wear reduces exposure.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

20/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

The brand's refusal to disclose FUTURELIGHT composition is the core transparency gap. Industry reporting indicates most 'PFAS-free' membranes use wax blends, polyurethane, or proprietary fluorine-free polymers; The North Face has not clarified which approach is used, leaving consumer risk assessment incomplete.

Source, ATSDR ↗
45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes (synthetic colorant toxicity)

The North Face is a major brand with standard chemical management; direct evidence of restricted azo dyes in this model is not documented. However, nylon and polyester base fabrics globally may incorporate azo dyes unless explicitly certified otherwise (e.g., bluesign); this jacket carries no such third-party mark.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Established manufacturing standards in North America and Europe restrict heavy metal pigments in apparel. No recalls or testing violations are on record for The North Face synthetic jackets. Risk is low relative to unregulated brands, but polyester-based apparel is not independently tested per item.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not publicly detailed the PFAS chemistry in FUTURELIGHT or committed to fluorine-free waterproofing across its range, despite growing industry pressure on this issue. The brand holds no known third-party certifications (e.g., bluesign, Cradle to Cradle) that would independently verify coating safety. The North Face has made general sustainability commitments but remains silent on membrane-specific chemical transparency, limiting external verification of claims.

How it compares in its category

High-end synthetic jackets in this performance tier typically rely on either legacy PFAS-based coatings or undisclosed proprietary alternatives. Competitors offering certified PFAS-free membranes (e.g., some Arc'teryx, Patagonia, and Rab lines using wax or polyurethane alternatives) provide more transparent chemical disclosure. The North Face's silence on FUTURELIGHT composition places this jacket in the middle-to-upper risk zone for informed consumers, despite solid material engineering.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently (cold water, gentle cycle, no fabric softener) to minimize leaching of any coating residues. Air dry only; heat from dryers can degrade synthetic membranes and potentially mobilize coating chemicals. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may compromise the waterproof layer. Replace the jacket if the membrane visibly delaminates or loses water repellency after several years of use, as coating breakdown can release particles.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to The North Face Men's Summit Superior FUTURELIGHT Jacket?

Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Azo dyes and color fastness

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Patagonia Men's Trail Craft Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Trail Craft Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.