PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Man Timberland Benton Shell Jacket

Timberland · Rain Jackets

Man Timberland Benton Shell Jacket

Bad

Moderate PFAS concern. Waterproof shell jackets typically use water-repellent coating treatments, often PFAS-based.

Verdict · SkipNylon shell with PFAS-based water-repellent coating finish presents moderate chemical exposure; acceptable if worn infrequently and laundered carefully to minimize leaching.

Timberland does not disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this jacket. Nylon shell jackets typically receive water-repellent finishes that may contain legacy PFAS compounds. No third-party verification available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon shell jackets routinely use PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes. Exposure occurs during wear (skin contact), laundering (leaching into water), and end-of-life disposal. Timberland has not disclosed the water-repellent coating chemistry for this model.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon fabrics may use formaldehyde-based resins during dyeing and finishing to improve colorfastness and wrinkle resistance. No specific recall or complaint record exists for Timberland Benton, but the hazard is inherent to nylon textile processing in this price segment.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during laundering

Synthetic nylon jackets shed microfibers during washing, particularly when agitated. Studies confirm nylon shedding rates similar to other synthetics; cumulative environmental and potential ingestion risk if water is reused or untreated.

45/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in nylon coloring

Nylon textiles may be dyed with azo dyes, some of which can cleave into aromatic amines under sweat, UV exposure, or heat. No specific Timberland violation is on record, but this is a known risk class for mass-market nylon apparel.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication pressure

As the water-repellent coating finish wears, consumers may reapply commercial treatments, some of which contain additional PFAS or other hydrophobic chemicals. Extended use encourages repeated chemical application over the jacket's lifecycle.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Benton Shell uses nylon as its outer shell fabric, a synthetic polymer chosen for durability and moisture resistance. The water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the nylon is the primary concern; most water-repellent coating treatments on mid-market outdoor jackets use PFAS-based chemistry, which bonds to fabric fibers to create persistent water-shedding properties. Nylon itself is stable and non-toxic under normal wear, but the finish is what drives chemical exposure during laundering and skin contact.

The brand's record and disclosure

Timberland has not publicly committed to PFAS-free waterproofing standards or disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry used in this jacket. The brand does hold some sustainability certifications (responsible wool, leather traceability) but has made no prominent statements on microfiber shedding or synthetic chemical phase-out. This silence on water-repellent coating ingredients is typical for mainstream outdoor apparel but reflects a gap in transparency that consumers concerned about PFAS exposure should note.

How it compares in its category

Most nylon shell jackets in this price tier (mid-range outdoor) use PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes; this is industry standard. Premium alternatives (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) offer options using wax-based or non-fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes, but at higher cost. Budget competitors typically apply the same PFAS finishes. This jacket sits in the mainstream category with no differentiation on chemical choice, making it neither worse nor better than comparable options on water-repellent coating hazard alone.

If you buy it

Wash separately from other garments on cold water and air dry to minimize microfiber shedding and reduce water-repellent coating leaching into household water systems. Avoid machine drying, which degrades the water-repellent coating finish and may release volatile compounds. Re-apply water-repellent coating treatment after 20-30 washes using PFAS-free products (silicone-based) if available, or accept reduced water resistance as a reason to replace rather than re-treat. Wear frequency matters, occasional use poses lower cumulative exposure than frequent heavy wear.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Timberland has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.