PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Top Flite Classic Golf Collection Gift Set And Super Grip Golf Glove

Top Flite · Golf Balls & Equipment

Top Flite Classic Golf Collection Gift Set And Super Grip Golf Glove

Poor

Products likely lower PFAS risk but no brand treatment transparency.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls and gloves pose minimal established chemical hazards; Top Flite's silence on treatments is typical for this category, not a red flag.

Gift set with golf balls and glove possibly containing water-resistant or moisture treatments. Top Flite doesn't disclose PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Wilson Ultra Distance Golf Balls

Wilson

Wilson Ultra Distance Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Golf balls (synthetic cover), golf glove (leather/synthetic with moisture-wicking treatment)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textiles sometimes use formaldehyde-based finishes for durability and moisture management. Top Flite does not disclose treatment chemistry; exposure is limited because the glove is worn briefly and laundered regularly, not ingested or continuously skin-contacted.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Allergen sensitization from leather or synthetic leather (glove material)

Leather or faux-leather gloves can retain processing chemicals (tanning agents, adhesives) that trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Top Flite does not specify tanning methods or synthetic coating composition; pre-wash before extended wear may reduce risk.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding (glove wear and tear)

Synthetic leather or polyester blend gloves may shed microfibers during use and washing. This is a dispersal concern rather than direct toxicity; environmental impact is the primary consideration rather than user safety.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Dyes and colorants (synthetic cover/glove textile)

No azo dyes or heavy metal pigment contamination has been reported in Top Flite balls or branded gloves. Standard synthetic leather and polymer inks are regulated under consumer product safety rules; risk is negligible in this application.

95/ 100

Polymer off-gassing or volatile organics (golf ball cover)

Surlyn and urethane polymer covers do not emit significant VOCs during normal storage or use at room temperature. No recalls or field complaints of odor-related health effects exist for Top Flite balls.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Top Flite golf balls use synthetic cover materials (typically surlyn or urethane polymers) over rubber/synthetic cores, designed to withstand repeated impact and UV exposure. The Super Grip glove combines leather or synthetic leather with moisture-wicking textile treatments to maintain grip in wet conditions. Neither material class is typically processed with hazardous heavy metals or persistent coatings that degrade into food or air; golf equipment does not contact skin continuously or release volatiles during normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Top Flite, owned by Callaway Golf, does not publish detailed material safety disclosures or independent chemical certifications for individual products. No recalls specific to chemical contamination (lead, cadmium, volatile organics) in Top Flite balls or gloves appear in public safety databases. The brand's silence on treatment chemicals and PFAS is consistent with the broader golf equipment industry, which lacks transparency standards common in consumer textiles or cookware.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls and gloves are lower-risk compared to apparel in close skin contact or cookware that heats food, because they do not accumulate residues or leach into consumption pathways. Most competing brands (Titleist, Bridgestone, Taylormade) offer similarly opaque disclosures and no third-party certifications. This product set is typical in its lack of transparency; no evidence suggests Top Flite performs worse than peers.

If you buy it

Wash the glove regularly with mild soap and water to remove accumulated sweat and dirt, which can trap moisture and promote microbial growth rather than chemical breakdown. Store balls in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to minimize polymer degradation over years of use. Replace the glove if seams tear or synthetic coatings peel visibly, as structural failure increases wear on skin rather than chemical risk. Golf balls are durable; no routine maintenance affects chemical safety.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Top Flite has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.