PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall52/ 100Good
u by kotex compact regular unscented tampons, 32 tampons

U by Kotex · Tampons

u by kotex compact regular unscented tampons, 32 tampons

Good

Lower concern. Core materials inherently low-risk, brand silent on PFAS.

Verdict: BuyStandard period-care product with no established safety red flags; rayon/cotton blend carries low inherent toxicity risk; brand maintains routine safety compliance.

Tampons are primarily rayon and cotton, materials with no known PFAS risk. U by Kotex makes no PFAS claims either way; no third-party testing data publicly available.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

rayon/viscose core, cotton/synthetic blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation or allergic contact dermatitis from materials

Rayon/cotton blends are low-irritancy materials, but individual sensitivity to synthetic fibers in the applicator or coating is possible. No brand-specific irritation pattern is documented for U by Kotex in available sources.

70/ 100

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) from prolonged wear

TSS is a known rare but serious risk associated with all tampons, including conventional rayon/cotton variants. Risk is mitigated by following standard usage guidelines (change every 4-8 hours). This is a category-wide concern, not specific to U by Kotex.

45/ 100
🫧

Applicator degradation and microplastic shedding

Synthetic blend applicators can degrade with friction or moisture exposure. No independent testing of U by Kotex applicators for microplastic shedding is available; this remains a potential concern for all synthetic-applicator tampons.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100

Bleaching residues (dioxins/furans) in rayon core

Rayon is bleached during manufacturing; however, final fiber products used in U.S. marketed tampons are not established to retain harmful dioxin or furan residues at toxicologically relevant levels. No public recalls or safety alerts specific to this product exist on record.

95/ 100

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance chemicals

This product is unscented, eliminating fragrance as a hazard source. Scented variants of tampons have historically been criticized for undisclosed fragrance additives; this formulation avoids that risk.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

U by Kotex Compact Regular tampons use a rayon/viscose core (bleached cellulose fibers) wrapped in a cotton/synthetic blend applicator and outer absorbent layer. Rayon is chemically processed from wood pulp but does not retain harmful residues in the final fiber form. The unscented formulation avoids fragrance additives, which eliminates a common source of undisclosed chemicals and potential irritants in period products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kotex (owned by Kimberly-Clark) does not publish detailed ingredient lists or third-party testing results for this product line, which is typical for mainstream tampon manufacturers. The brand has not faced major recalls or public health controversies tied to this product specifically. U by Kotex markets toward younger consumers and does not claim organic, hypoallergenic, or premium safety certifications that might prompt higher scrutiny.

How it compares in its category

This product occupies the mainstream middle ground: more affordable than certified organic/medical-grade alternatives (such as Organyc or Seventh Generation) but similarly composed to other conventional tampons using rayon/cotton blends. It lacks third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, Cradle to Cradle) that some competitors pursue. The unscented option is a practical advantage over scented variants, which introduce fragrance chemicals with minimal disclosed safety data.

If you buy it

Follow standard tampon hygiene: change every 4-8 hours to reduce toxic shock syndrome (TSS) risk, regardless of absorbency. Store in a dry place; do not expose to excessive heat or moisture, which can degrade the applicator integrity. Discontinue use and consult a healthcare provider if you experience unusual irritation, odor, or symptoms consistent with TSS (fever, rash, dizziness). This product is designed for single use only.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
U by Kotex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Tampons

Lola Organic Tampons

Lola

Organic Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Cardboard degradation or splinters

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton base with third-party certifications support claim.

MADE SAFE certifiedOEKO-TEX certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons

Lola

Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade100Excellent
Excellent

Lower concern. Third-party verified PFAS-free organic cotton tampons.

MADE SAFEOEKO-TEX

Lab test found no PFAS

Seventh Generation Tampons

Seventh Generation

Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal contamination

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; organic cotton base with PFAS-free claim.

MADE SAFE certifiedLeaping Bunny certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More tampons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.