PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Vice Golf Pro Tracer Golf Balls

Vice Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Golf Pro Tracer Golf Balls

Poor

Skip until brand discloses coating formula or confirms PFAS-free status.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls carry minimal ingestion/skin hazard risk; PFAS coating chemistry undisclosed but typical for water-resistant sports equipment. Buy with caution until Vice discloses.

This ball features undisclosed waterproof coating while Vice Golf provides no PFAS transparency. Golf ball coatings typically use waterproof treatments.

The better-graded swap

Bridgestone Precept Power Drive

Precept

Bridgestone Precept Power Drive

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic rubber cover with undisclosed waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

The specific chemistry of Vice's waterproof treatment is proprietary and unavailable for review. Coatings may contain silicones, waxes, or other polymers with lower concern on inert rubber, but absence of disclosure prevents verification of manufacturing contaminants or degradation byproducts.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from cover wear

Like all synthetic sports balls, Vice Pro Tracers shed microparticles when scuffed or degraded on course over time. Quantity is negligible per ball and does not constitute an inhalation or ingestion hazard during play, though cumulative environmental impact is a valid concern for heavily used courses.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet

Golf balls stored in damp conditions can develop surface mold or mildew on the cover and in packaging crevices, especially if waterproof coating fails or allows water ingress. This is a maintenance issue, not a manufacturing defect, and poses minimal risk during play.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic rubber off-gassing or degradation

Ionomeric and urethane rubber covers do not release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at ambient temperatures or during normal golf play. Degradation over years of sun and heat exposure is cosmetic rather than chemically hazardous, though old balls may shed microparticles.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Vice balls exist in public records. Synthetic ball manufacturing does not typically introduce these elements, though raw material sourcing standards are not publicly disclosed.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Vice Pro Tracer balls use a synthetic rubber cover (likely ionomeric or urethane blend) with an undisclosed waterproof coating applied for durability and water repellence. The cover material itself is inert under normal use conditions, but the coating composition remains proprietary, which prevents independent assessment of whether it contains fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or other persistent chemicals. Golf balls do not contact food or skin extensively, so dermal absorption and ingestion pathways are minimal compared to cookware or apparel.

The brand's record and disclosure

Vice Golf has not published material safety data sheets, chemical composition disclosures, or PFAS-free certifications for their ball lines. The brand markets durability and performance but maintains silence on coating chemistry and supplier standards. No recalls or safety incidents specific to Vice balls have been documented in public records. This opacity around waterproof treatment composition is typical for the golf ball industry but falls short of modern transparency expectations for chemical hazards.

How it compares in its category

Most premium golf balls (Titleist, Callaway, Bridgestone) similarly withhold detailed coating formulations; the category as a whole lacks transparency. Some manufacturers have begun voluntary PFAS disclosure or elimination, but Vice has not joined this trend. Budget and mid-tier balls often use identical synthetic rubber bases and functional coatings, so material risk profiles are broadly comparable across brands. Vice positions itself as a transparency-focused direct-to-consumer brand, making the coating silence a notable inconsistency.

If you buy it

Golf balls pose no heating, ingestion, or prolonged skin contact risks during play; store in a cool, dry place to prevent rubber degradation over years. Do not allow children to chew or mouth the balls. Rinse with plain water after play in saltwater or muddy conditions to extend cover life and remove any surface residues. Request material safety documentation directly from Vice if chemical transparency matters to your household; buyer feedback may accelerate disclosure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Vice Golf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.