PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
WILSON GOLF Winter Adult GOLF Gloves

Wilson · Golf Balls & Equipment

WILSON GOLF Winter Adult GOLF Gloves

Poor

Winter golf gloves likely use water-repellent coating. PFAS status unclear from Wilson.

Verdict · SkipWinter golf gloves present low acute hazard profile; water-repellent coating PFAS status unclear but not a contact-intensive garment; Wilson has no established safety violations in this category.

Wilson winter golf gloves use synthetic leather or polyurethane with thermal lining, likely treated with water-repellent coating finish. Wilson discloses nothing about PFAS.

The better-graded swap

FootJoy StaSof Golf Glove

FootJoy

FootJoy StaSof Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic leather or polyurethane with thermal lining, likely water-repellent coating-treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Winter golf gloves almost certainly use water-repellent coating treatment for water repellency. Wilson has not disclosed whether this uses fluorinated (PFAS) or non-fluorinated chemistry. Skin contact during wear is moderate; hand perspiration may slightly accelerate any leaching, but gloves are not worn against bare skin for extended periods.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

Thermal lining degradation and fibrillation

Fleece or synthetic lining can shed microfibers with repeated washing and wear, particularly if heat-dried. This is a normal wear pattern for insulated gloves and is not specific to Wilson, but hand contact with worn lining is a minor ingestion route for microplastics.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic leather and polyurethane coatings may contain formaldehyde-based binders as part of the manufacturing process, but Wilson products are not documented to exceed formaldehyde limits set by US apparel standards. No specific test data on these gloves exists in public records.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colored materials

Winter golf gloves are typically dark colors (black, navy, grey) and do not require bright or complex dyes. Most dark synthetic leather and polyurethane is colored with non-azo or low-risk pigments, though Wilson does not publicly confirm this.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Wilson winter golf gloves are not documented to contain lead, cadmium, or antimony in amounts that exceed apparel safety limits. No recalls or test failures on record for this product line.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wilson winter golf gloves combine synthetic leather or polyurethane with thermal lining (likely fleece or synthetic insulation) and a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) topcoat. The synthetic leather avoids the tanning chemicals and heavy metals sometimes present in genuine leather, while polyurethane itself is relatively inert once cured. The thermal lining is typically non-toxic; the main concern is the water-repellent coating finish, which may contain fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water resistance, though Wilson does not publicly disclose the specific chemistry.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wilson (Amer Sports) has not made public commitments to phase out PFAS in textiles and has not published material safety data sheets for apparel products. The brand has no documented recalls or safety controversies specific to golf gloves. Wilson does not hold third-party certifications such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign for apparel, which limits independent verification of chemical inputs.

How it compares in its category

Winter golf gloves are inherently low-risk apparel because contact is brief, they are worn over hands (not against skin for extended periods), and they are not ingested or heated in ways that would accelerate leaching. Most competitors (Callaway, Titleist, FootJoy) use similar polyurethane-plus-water-repellent coating construction and similarly lack transparent PFAS disclosure. Some premium alternatives (e.g., merino wool blends with PFC-free water repellency) exist but are rarer and more expensive.

If you buy it

Wash gloves separately in cool water and air-dry to preserve the water-repellent coating finish and avoid accelerating any potential leaching from coatings. Do not machine dry or expose to high heat, which can damage the polyurethane and lining. Replace when the grip becomes worn or lining degrades (typically after 1-2 seasons of regular use). Store in a dry place to prevent mold growth in the thermal lining, which can harbor bacteria if left damp.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wilson has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.