PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
Wilson Men's Winter Golf Gloves

Wilson · Golf Balls & Equipment

Wilson Men's Winter Golf Gloves

Poor

Winter gloves likely water-treated. Wilson provides no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict · SkipWilson winter golf gloves pose moderate concern, synthetic leather/polyurethane with undisclosed water-resistant treatment (likely PFAS); no major textile hazards on record, but brand transparency is poor.

Golf gloves typically use synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS. Wilson does not publicly disclose PFAS content or testing, and no certifications exist.

The better-graded swap

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls

Volvik

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather / polyurethane with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Winter golf gloves require durable water resistance; Wilson does not disclose whether their water-repellent coating uses PFAS or alternatives. Synthetic leather gloves in this price/performance tier typically employ C8 or newer fluorinated compounds applied during manufacturing. Skin contact during wear poses low acute risk but cumulative exposure is unquantified.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

Polyurethane coating degradation

Synthetic leather coatings degrade over time with heat, sweat, and flexing. As polyurethane breaks down, small particles and residual coating chemicals may shed onto skin or be inhaled during wear. This is a slow process in gloves but accelerates with poor care (heat exposure, machine washing).

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergens from synthetic materials or adhesives

Polyurethane glues and polyurethane leather itself can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals, though this is uncommon. Fragrance or antimicrobial additives in the knit lining are not confirmed in Wilson's specs but may be present; no documented cases for this brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or industry reports specific to Wilson golf gloves for formaldehyde resin finishes on knit backing. Standard athletic glove production does not typically use high-formaldehyde resins, though imported knit linings may carry trace residues. No evidence of concern for this product line.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Wilson gloves are typically black or neutral synthetic leather with minimal dyed fabric. No known reports of restricted azo dyes or heavy metal pigments in Wilson winter glove lines. Standard polyurethane colorants in this category are low-risk.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These gloves use synthetic leather (polyurethane) rather than genuine leather, bonded to a knit backing. The water-resistant treatment applied to the surface is Wilson's primary chemical concern, synthetic leather coatings commonly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to repel moisture, though Wilson does not specify which chemistry they employ. Polyurethane itself is generally stable and does not off-gas formaldehyde or volatile organics at room temperature in finished gloves, making the coating chemistry the main exposure route.

The brand's record and disclosure

Wilson does not publish material safety data, chemical disclosures, or PFAS commitments for apparel products. The company has no known certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) that would verify absence of restricted substances in their glove lines. This silence on water-resistant chemistry is typical of sporting goods brands but leaves consumers unable to confirm whether the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment uses legacy PFAS, newer alternatives, or non-fluorinated methods.

How it compares in its category

Winter gloves across brands typically use either wool/natural fibers (which require minimal chemical treatment), or synthetic leather with water-repellent coating coatings. Wilson's approach is mainstream for performance golf gloves and carries similar undisclosed water-repellent chemistry as most competitors (Callaway, Titleist). Brands offering transparent PFAS-free or certified gloves (e.g., some Patagonia or wool-based alternatives) are fewer and often more expensive, making Wilson's position middle-of-the-road for the category.

If you buy it

Wash gloves by hand in cool water; avoid hot water or machine washing, which can degrade the polyurethane coating and potentially increase leaching of residual coating chemicals. Do not expose to direct heat sources (radiators, dryers). Replace gloves when the synthetic leather surface cracks, peels, or delaminates, as damaged coating integrity may release particles. Store in a cool, dry place to extend coating life and minimize chemical off-gassing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wilson has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.