Wilson · Golf Balls & Equipment
Wilson Staff Model X Golf Balls
Golf balls likely use water-repellent coatings; composition not disclosed.
Wilson does not publicly disclose PFAS use or absence in Model X golf balls. Standard golf ball covers often employ water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS; no lab data confirms either way.
The better-graded swap
Dunlop
New Dunlop Double Titanium 12 Pack - Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Surlyn cover with internal windings, water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Golf balls universally require water-resistant surface treatment; Teflon-family coating coatings are industry standard. Wilson has not disclosed specific PFAS chemistry or alternatives. Coatings remain stable during normal play but may degrade if ball is heated or abraded heavily.
Source, ATSDR ↗Surlyn cover degradation and leaching
Ionomer resin covers can degrade over time (1-3 years of play) or with exposure to UV and extreme temperature. Degraded plastic may release oligomers or plasticizer residues. Risk is low for hand contact but increases if ball fragments are ingested (young children).
Microplastic shedding
Repeated impact and abrasion of Surlyn cover can produce fine plastic particles, especially in aquatic environments (water hazards, lost balls). Shed particles are not inhaled during play but accumulate in waterways; not a direct user hazard.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
Golf balls use synthetic dyes for color (typically azo or polymeric types). No documented cadmium, lead, or chromium contamination in major brand balls. Hand contact during play poses negligible absorption risk; risk would apply only to direct ingestion.
Source, FDA ↗Off-gassing from windings/adhesives
Internal rubber and synthetic windings may contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs). No published data on off-gassing rates; exposure is minimal since core is sealed under cover. Risk rises only if ball is heated above 140F (60C) or cut open.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Wilson Staff Model X balls use a Surlyn (ionomer resin) cover over rubber/synthetic core windings. Surlyn is a durable, impact-resistant thermoplastic that resists water absorption and maintains performance across temperature ranges. The cover is treated with water-repellent coating (likely Teflon-family coating-based, given industry practice) to extend playability in wet conditions. The internal windings provide compression and spin characteristics but are not user-accessible during normal play.
The brand's record and disclosure
Wilson (Amer Sports, later Genuine Holdings) has not publicly disclosed detailed PFAS or chemical composition statements for golf balls. The brand offers no third-party certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, bluesign) specific to ball chemistry. No recall history or health warnings on record for Model X balls. Transparency on water-repellent coatings and fluorochemical use remains absent from public materials.
How it compares in its category
Golf balls are not classified as food-contact or personal-care items, so consumer exposure pathways are limited to hand contact and rare ingestion (small children only). Compared to premium balls (e.g., Titleist Pro V1) or budget alternatives, Surlyn covers are mid-range for durability and cost. Most golf balls in this segment use similar ionomer/Teflon-family coating combinations; Wilson is not an outlier in chemical approach but matches industry baseline.
If you buy it
Store balls in cool, dry conditions to prevent cover cracking and premature water absorption. Do not subject balls to extreme heat (e.g., closed car in summer), which can degrade the cover and increase off-gassing risk. Wash hands after handling if you have young children in the home and they may place hands in mouth. Replace balls when cover shows visible cuts, cracks, or excessive discoloration, as degradation compromises performance and may increase material contact risk.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Wilson has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment
Vice Golf
Vice Drip Golf Balls
synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover
PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Chromium in leather tanning residue
Limited concern
Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components
Limited concern
Heavy metals
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather
Limited concern
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.