PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
Women Asolo Field GV

Asolo · Running & Athletic Shoes

Women Asolo Field GV

Bad

Unknown waterproof finish on leather; PFAS status unclear, skip if possible.

Verdict · SkipLeather hiking boot with unconfirmed waterproof treatment; PFAS status unclear. Non-PFAS hazards minimal if maintained. Buy only if waterproofing method disclosed or avoided.

Asolo does not disclose waterproofing chemistry for this hiking boot. Leather uppers often receive water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but no confirmation available for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

leather upper, unspecified waterproof treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

Aqua Pure

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

95ExcellentPFAS grade
  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

AQUASURE Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

Aquasure

Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

What Women Asolo Field GV is made of, ingredients and materials

The Women Asolo Field GV uses a leather upper, a natural material with lower inherent toxicity risk compared to synthetic polymers. Leather tanning itself can involve chromium or vegetable methods, but Asolo does not publicly specify which process is used for this model. The unspecified waterproof treatment is the material concern here, leather is often treated with water repellents that may include fluorinated compounds (PFAS), silicones, or wax-based finishes. Without transparency on which method Asolo applied, the chemical profile of the finished upper cannot be fully assessed.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified waterproof treatment on leather upper; common in hiking boots but Asolo does not confirm chemistry. PFAS grade of 20/100 reflects this uncertainty. Contact with skin during wear may pose low acute risk, but bioaccumulation over repeated use of multiple treated garments is a chronic concern.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Adhesive off-gassing (volatile organics)

Leather boots rely on adhesives to bond uppers to soles and internal linings. New footwear commonly off-gasses volatile compounds for the first few days to weeks. This is typically low-level but can cause mild respiratory irritation or odor; ventilation mitigates this.

70/ 100
⏳

Degradation of waterproof coating over time

Leather waterproofing treatments degrade with wear, UV exposure, and cleaning, particularly in high-flex zones around the ankle and toe. Once coating fails, water penetration accelerates leather breakdown and may increase off-gassing of residual treatment chemicals.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Hexavalent chromium in leather tanning

No public information indicates whether Asolo uses chromium or vegetable tanning for this model. Chromium III (used in most commercial tanning) is lower concern than hexavalent chromium (Cr VI), which is restricted in EU footwear but not universally prohibited. Absence of tanning method disclosure prevents full hazard characterization.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Asolo does not disclose lining composition (likely synthetic fabric or cotton blend). Formaldehyde-based resins are used in some textile finishing, but no specific record of this hazard in Asolo products exists. Low concern if linings are untreated natural fiber.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Asolo does not maintain publicly available disclosure on waterproofing chemistry, tanning methods, or compliance with PFAS restrictions for this product line. The brand has not published a stance on PFAS phase-out or material testing certifications (such as Leather Working Group environmental standards) that would clarify tanning and finishing practices. No recalls or documented chemical safety controversies are on record for Asolo footwear, but the absence of disclosure is itself a limitation for informed choice.

How it compares in its category

Women's leather hiking boots typically fall into a hazard-conscious category because foot-proximal textiles and adhesives can off-gas or leach chemicals. The Asolo Field GV is positioned as a premium option, which historically correlates with stricter material sourcing, but this product's lack of visible certification undermines confidence. Competitors in the hiking boot category increasingly provide tanning and waterproofing documentation; Asolo's silence here is a relative gap, though not uncommon in the outdoor footwear market.

If you buy it

Ventilate the shoe indoors for 24-48 hours after purchase to allow any volatile compounds from finishing treatments to off-gas. Clean and dry the leather regularly; avoid machine washing or direct heat sources (radiators, ovens), which can accelerate adhesive breakdown or finish degradation. If waterproofing visibly wears (water no longer beads on the surface), spot-clean with a soft brush; do not reapply unknown treatments. Replace when the sole wears significantly or the upper shows permanent water staining, as degraded waterproofing may indicate chemical finish failure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Asolo has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C

Converse

Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Canvas upper, rubber sole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes in canvas

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Converse Run Star Trainer

Converse

Run Star Trainer

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Canvas, rubber sole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Find an alternative on Amazon
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and color-based toxins

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.