PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Athleta Womens Aqualuxe Plunge One Piece

Athleta · Swimwear

Athleta Womens Aqualuxe Plunge One Piece

Bad

Avoid until Athleta discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or switches to PFAS-free.

Verdict: SkipNylon swimwear with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish poses moderate PFAS risk; non-PFAS hazards minimal if cared properly. Proceed with caution until disclosure.

The Aqualuxe one-piece uses nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish typical of performance swimwear, which commonly relies on PFAS-based chemistry. Athleta offers no public disclosure of its water-repellent coating treatment or PFAS status without third-party testing or commitment to PFAS-free alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon swimwear water-repellent coating finishes are predominantly fluorochemical-based (PFAS); Athleta's silence on composition suggests conventional treatment. PFAS can migrate into skin during wear and into wastewater during laundering.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

water-repellent coating and elastic finishes on swimwear may contain trace formaldehyde releasers. Nylon blends with stretch components sometimes use formaldehyde-based resins; Athleta does not publicly disclose finish chemistry.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Nylon garments shed microfibers during washing, contributing to marine microplastic pollution. Athleta Aqualuxe offers no stated microfiber-reduction technology (e.g., anti-shed yarns).

70/ 100

Coating degradation and chemical release

water-repellent coating coatings on synthetic textiles degrade with laundering and UV exposure, potentially releasing residual treatment chemicals. Athleta provides standard care tags but no specific guidance on minimizing chemical release during product lifetime.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

No recalls or public safety data specific to Athleta Aqualuxe dye composition. Nylon can carry azo dyes; reputable apparel makers screen for banned carcinogenic azo compounds, but absence of reported hazard does not guarantee independent testing.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Athleta Aqualuxe is nylon-blend with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating coatings on swimwear are typically fluorochemical-based (PFAS family) or occasionally silicone alternatives, though Athleta has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use. Nylon itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low leaching risk in water; the concern centers entirely on the water-repellent treatment and how it degrades with washing and UV exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Athleta, owned by Gap Inc., has not published a public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating chemistry or transparency on fluorochemical use in swimwear as of available records. The brand has not faced major product recalls for hazardous coatings, but silence on water-repellent coating composition is notable given industry-wide pressure to disclose or eliminate PFAS. This lack of transparency is the primary red flag, not an established safety failure.

How it compares in its category

Water-resistant swimwear routinely relies on water-repellent coating finishes; Athleta's approach is standard industry practice. Competitors like Patagonia and some EU brands have begun transitioning to PFAS-free or wax-based water repellents with full disclosure, making Athleta's silence increasingly notable. Budget swimwear often uses similar undisclosed water-repellent coating, while premium brands increasingly lead on transparency. This product sits in the middle of a market in transition.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air dry to minimize water-repellent coating degradation and chemical leaching into your home water. Avoid high heat (dryers, hot water) which accelerates coating breakdown and potential release of residual chemicals. Replace when water beading noticeably diminishes (typically 1-2 years with regular use), as degraded water-repellent coating offers no protection and may concentrate residues. Request water-repellent composition from Athleta customer service; consumer demand for disclosure drives industry change.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Athleta has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Swimwear

Speedo Women's Eco Solid Adult Super Pro Swimsuit

Speedo

Women's Eco Solid Adult Super Pro Swimsuit

Polyester/nylon blend (standard swimsuit fabric)

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, typical swimwear without known water-repellent treatment, though Speedo has not disclosed PFAS avoidance.

Risky category by default

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, basic swimwear without water-repellent coating, though Patagonia's broader PFAS practices warrant review.

Risky category by default

Aerie String Triangle Bikini Top

Aerie

String Triangle Bikini Top

nylon/polyester blend (standard swimwear)

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower PFAS concern, untreated swimwear unlikely to require water-repellent coating chemicals.

Risky category by default

More swimwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.