PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Bounty Select-A-Size Triple Roll Paper Towels

Bounty · Paper Napkins & Paper Towels

Bounty Select-A-Size Triple Roll Paper Towels

Poor

Moderate PFAS risk from grease-resistant treatment. Bounty discloses nothing.

Verdict: SkipPaper towels pose minimal chemical hazards beyond PFAS in coating; standard cellulose product with no major brand safety red flags.

Bounty Select-A-Size Triple Roll is treated to resist grease and moisture, a common use for PFAS-based water or oil repellents. Bounty makes no public coating claims.

The safe swap

Seventh Generation 100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

Seventh Generation

Seventh Generation 100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose pulp with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Grease-resistant treatment on paper towels almost always contains fluorinated chemicals (PFAS). Migration to food or skin, especially in hot or oily contexts, is a known concern in peer-reviewed literature, though quantified risk in casual use is not established. Bounty's silence on this is a transparency failure.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Paper towels naturally shed small cellulose fibers, which may carry trace coating residue. Direct contact with food or mouth could introduce both fibers and any PFAS or other chemicals on them. The triple-roll format (thinner, more absorbent sheets) may shed slightly more than standard towels due to manufacturing for reduced thickness.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth if wet-stored

Cellulose paper is hygroscopic and will support mold or bacterial growth if left damp or stored in humid conditions. This is a use and storage issue, not a manufacturing hazard, but it is relevant to food safety and respiratory health if spores are inhaled during use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Ink or dye transfer

Bounty paper towels are bleached white; no inks are typically printed on the sheet itself. No known incidents of dye migration or heavy-metal contamination in inks have been reported for this brand or product category.

95/ 100

Chlorine residue from pulp bleaching

Modern pulp bleaching is typically chlorine-free or uses low-chlorine methods; no evidence of harmful chlorine residue in commercial paper towels has been reported. Trace chlorine compounds, if present, would be minimal and unlikely to cause issues with casual contact.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bounty Select-A-Size is primarily cellulose pulp (wood fiber) with a grease-resistant coating applied to resist oils and liquids. That coating is the likely source of PFAS chemicals (fluorinated compounds), though Bounty does not disclose its exact chemical composition. The pulp itself is inert and safe; the concern is entirely the treatment layer and whether it sheds microfibers or leaches during use with hot or oily foods.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bounty (Procter & Gamble) does not publicly disclose PFAS use, content, or safety testing for paper towels. P&G has faced pressure from consumer groups over PFAS in food-contact products but has made no commitments specific to paper towels. The brand has no known recalls or safety controversies tied to this product. Transparency on grease-resistant chemistry remains a gap across the paper towel industry.

How it compares in its category

Most major paper towel brands (Bounty, Scott, Viva) use grease-resistant coatings, making PFAS exposure fairly universal in this category if you prioritize liquid absorption. Uncoated or minimally treated alternatives (e.g., simple kraft paper towels, cloth reusables) exist but are less absorbent. Bounty Select-A-Size is a mid-range offering; premium and budget options carry similar coating risks.

If you buy it

Use for wiping hands, counters, and non-food spills without concern. Avoid prolonged contact with hot foods or oily residues directly on the paper before it touches your mouth or skin. Replace rolls when the sheet integrity degrades or if you notice ink transfer. Store in a dry place to prevent mold growth, which is a hygiene issue with any cellulose product, especially in humid kitchens.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 52% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bounty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Paper Napkins & Paper Towels

Seventh Generation 100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

Seventh Generation

100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

100% recycled paper (virgin fiber-free)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🎨

Ink and dye migration from recycled fiber

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern choice. Plain paper napkins rarely require PFAS treatment.

Risky category by default

Bounty Quilted Napkins, 1-Ply, White, 100 Count

Bounty

Quilted Napkins, 1-Ply, White, 100 Count

Virgin wood pulp, 1-ply, no waterproofing layer

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade70Good
Good

Lower concern. Single-ply napkins unlikely to need PFAS coatings.

Risky category by default

100% Recycled Paper Napkins

Seventh Generation

100% Recycled Paper Napkins

100% recycled paper

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Trace metals and contaminants from recycled feedstock

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth (mold, mildew) in storage

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern choice. Recycled paper napkins typically avoid PFAS treatment.

Risky category by default

More paper napkins & paper towels grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.